Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry (IMB), Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Int Dent J. 2017 Oct;67(5):299-307. doi: 10.1111/idj.12300. Epub 2017 May 15.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of a dichotomous index, based on a special interdental brushing tool, to detect initial pathological processes in interproximal areas. Furthermore, different techniques of interdental hygiene were compared.
Participants (n = 108) were instructed to clean their teeth using the Bass technique and were randomly assigned to three groups according to the type of interdental cleaning used: group A, use of interdental brushes; group B, no interdental hygiene (the control group); and group C, use of dental floss. Approximal Plaque Index (API), Plaque Index (PI), modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mSBI) and the Bleeding on Brushing Index (BOB) were measured at baseline, and after 2 (t1) and 4 (t2) weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test and the Mann-Whitney U-test.
One-hundred and six participants completed the study. The BOB decreased significantly in all groups (P < 0.001) with the most pronounced reduction being recorded for group A (baseline: 49.3 ± 23.0%; 4 weeks: 5.1 ± 6.9%). Also, the mSBI (P < 0.001) decreased significantly in all groups during the study. The API appeared to be less affected by the oral hygiene than other indices. The highest correlation was observed between BOB and mSBI (r = 0.785, P < 0.001).
The BOB is a valuable complement for the existing array of indices in preventive dentistry, and is able to detect potential pathological processes in interproximal spaces. Additionally, this study suggests that interdental hygiene with individually selected brushes is superior to flossing.
With the BOB, gingival inflammation can be demonstrated to patients, which could increase compliance.
本研究旨在评估一种基于特殊牙间刷的二分指数,以检测牙间区初始病理过程的适用性。此外,还比较了不同的牙间清洁技术。
参与者(n=108)被指示使用巴斯技术清洁牙齿,并根据使用的牙间清洁类型随机分为三组:组 A,使用牙间刷;组 B,不进行牙间清洁(对照组);组 C,使用牙线。在基线时、第 2 周(t1)和第 4 周(t2)测量近中菌斑指数(API)、菌斑指数(PI)、改良龈沟出血指数(mSBI)和刷牙出血指数(BOB)。统计分析采用 Wilcoxon 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验。
106 名参与者完成了研究。所有组的 BOB 均显著降低(P<0.001),其中组 A 的降低最明显(基线:49.3±23.0%;4 周:5.1±6.9%)。此外,在整个研究期间,所有组的 mSBI 均显著降低。API 似乎比其他指数受口腔卫生影响较小。BOB 与 mSBI 之间的相关性最高(r=0.785,P<0.001)。
BOB 是预防牙科中现有指数阵列的有价值补充,能够检测牙间区的潜在病理过程。此外,本研究表明,使用个体选择的牙间刷进行牙间清洁优于使用牙线。
使用 BOB 可以向患者展示牙龈炎症,从而提高患者的依从性。