Di Milia Lee, Folkard Simon
School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 16;12:782349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782349. eCollection 2021.
Self-report tools that measure circadian rhythms have focused primarily on phase. We add to the sparse literature on assessing amplitude and stability. We randomly recruited 1,163 participants who completed several measures. The correlation between the LV scale (amplitude) and FR scale (stability) was -0.12 ( < 0.01). As expected, amplitude was negatively associated with phase ( = -0.64, < 0.01) while stability showed a weak link with phase ( = 0.07, < 0.05). Structural equation modeling suggested a close model-fit of the factor structure in the sample (RMSEA = 0.033). The LV scale explained 22% of the variance, while the FR scale explained 23%. Scale reliability was satisfactory for the LV scale (0.68) and good for the FR scale (0.73). Participants with low amplitude or flexible rhythms reported significantly better resilience, coping, and required less daily sleep. We constructed a composite circadian categorical variable to combine the best attributes from the LV and FR scales; participants with low amplitude and flexible rhythms, reported significantly better resilience, coping, and less sleep need. We found rhythm amplitude decreased with age, while stability remained constant.
测量昼夜节律的自我报告工具主要关注相位。我们在评估振幅和稳定性的稀少文献基础上进行补充。我们随机招募了1163名参与者,他们完成了多项测量。LV量表(振幅)和FR量表(稳定性)之间的相关性为-0.12(<0.01)。正如预期的那样,振幅与相位呈负相关(=-0.64,<0.01),而稳定性与相位的联系较弱(=0.07,<0.05)。结构方程模型表明样本中的因子结构具有良好的模型拟合度(RMSEA = 0.033)。LV量表解释了22%的方差,而FR量表解释了23%。LV量表的量表信度令人满意(0.68),FR量表的量表信度良好(0.73)。振幅低或节律灵活的参与者报告的恢复力、应对能力明显更好,且每日所需睡眠时间更少。我们构建了一个综合昼夜分类变量,以结合LV和FR量表的最佳属性;振幅低且节律灵活的参与者报告的恢复力、应对能力明显更好,且睡眠需求更少。我们发现节律振幅随年龄增长而降低,而稳定性保持不变。