• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Conventional and functional assessment of spatial neglect: Clinical practice suggestions.空间忽视的传统与功能评估:临床实践建议
Neuropsychology. 2018 Oct;32(7):835-842. doi: 10.1037/neu0000469. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
2
Behavioral Assessment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect with the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) Using the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) in Patients with Subacute Stroke during Rehabilitation in Japan.日本亚急性期脑卒中康复患者中,使用凯斯勒基金会忽略评估过程(KF-NAP),对单侧空间忽略的 Catherine Bergego 量表(CBS)进行行为评估。
Behav Neurol. 2021 Feb 9;2021:8825192. doi: 10.1155/2021/8825192. eCollection 2021.
3
Psychometric evaluation of neglect assessment reveals motor-exploratory predictor of functional disability in acute-stage spatial neglect.忽略评估的心理测量学评估揭示了急性空间忽略期功能障碍的运动探索性预测因子。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.036.
4
Assessing chronic stroke survivors with aphasia sheds light on prevalence of spatial neglect.对慢性中风失语症幸存者进行评估有助于了解空间忽视的患病率。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Mar;24(2):91-98. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1196906. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
5
Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living.凯斯勒基金会疏忽评估流程专门用于测量日常生活活动中的空间疏忽。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):869-876.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
6
Functional assessment of spatial neglect: a review of the Catherine Bergego scale and an introduction of the Kessler foundation neglect assessment process.空间忽略的功能评估:Catherine Bergego 量表的回顾及凯斯勒基金会忽略评估过程的介绍。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):423-35. doi: 10.1310/tsr1905-423.
7
Spatial Neglect Predicts Upper Limb Use in the Activities of Daily Living.空间忽视可预测日常生活活动中的上肢使用情况。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;44(3-4):122-127. doi: 10.1159/000477500. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Association of delirium and spatial neglect in patients with right-hemisphere stroke.右半球卒中患者谵妄与空间忽视的关联。
PM R. 2023 Sep;15(9):1075-1082. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12922. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
How We Assess Spatial Neglect Matters: Prevalence of Spatial Neglect as Measured by the Catherine Bergego Scale and Impact on Rehabilitation Outcomes.我们如何评估空间忽略的问题:用 Catherine Bergego 量表测量的空间忽略的患病率及其对康复结果的影响。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May 1;100(5):443-449. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001710.
10
Severity of spatial neglect during acute inpatient rehabilitation predicts community mobility after stroke.急性住院康复期间空间忽视的严重程度可预测中风后的社区活动能力。
PM R. 2014 Aug;6(8):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Susceptibility to multitasking in stroke is associated to multiple-demand system damage and leads to lateralized visuospatial deficits.中风患者对多任务处理的易感性与多需求系统损伤有关,并导致偏侧化视觉空间缺陷。
Commun Biol. 2025 May 12;8(1):734. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08074-z.
2
Does prism adaptation treatment reduce spatial neglect and improve function?棱镜适应疗法能减少空间忽视并改善功能吗?
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Feb 5;6:1539887. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1539887. eCollection 2025.
3
[Interindividual variability in patients with visuospatial neglect: a retrospective study].[视觉空间忽视患者的个体间变异性:一项回顾性研究]
Rev Neurol. 2024 Jun 16;78(12):327-334. doi: 10.33588/rn.7812.2024085.
4
Identifying Spatial Neglect in Chronic Right Hemisphere Stroke Survivors Using the RHDBank Outcomes.利用 RHDBank 结果识别慢性右脑卒中幸存者的空间忽略
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Feb 12;67(2):511-523. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00285. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
5
Prism Adaptation Treatment Predicts Improved Rehabilitation Responses in Stroke Patients with Spatial Neglect.棱镜适应疗法可预测空间忽视型中风患者康复反应的改善。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 12;10(10):2009. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10102009.
6
Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review.空间忽视亚型、定义及评估工具:一项范围综述
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 24;12:742365. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.742365. eCollection 2021.
7
Applications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining the Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Rehabilitation of Spatial Neglect.功能磁共振成像在确定空间忽视的病理生理机制及康复中的应用
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 12;11:548568. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.548568. eCollection 2020.
8
Exploratory examination of lexical and neuroanatomic correlates of neglect dyslexia.忽视性失读症的词汇和神经解剖学相关性的探索性研究。
Neuropsychology. 2020 May;34(4):404-419. doi: 10.1037/neu0000619. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Lost in Classification: Lower Cognitive Functioning in Apparently Cognitive Normal Newly Diagnosed RRMS Patients.分类中的遗漏:新诊断的认知功能看似正常的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的较低认知功能
Brain Sci. 2019 Nov 13;9(11):321. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9110321.
10
Ipsilesional Impairments of Visual Awareness After Right-Hemispheric Stroke.右半球卒中后患侧视觉意识障碍
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 9;10:697. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00697. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Ask the experts how to treat individuals with spatial neglect: a survey study.询问专家如何治疗患有空间忽视症的个体:一项调查研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Nov;40(22):2677-2691. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1347720. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
2
Assessing chronic stroke survivors with aphasia sheds light on prevalence of spatial neglect.对慢性中风失语症幸存者进行评估有助于了解空间忽视的患病率。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Mar;24(2):91-98. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1196906. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Multi-tasking uncovers right spatial neglect and extinction in chronic left-hemisphere stroke patients.多任务揭示慢性左半球中风患者的右侧空间忽视和消退现象。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:147-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
The ecological assessment of unilateral neglect.单侧忽视的生态评估。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Spatial Neglect Hinders Success of Inpatient Rehabilitation in Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study.空间忽视阻碍创伤性脑损伤患者住院康复的成功:一项回顾性研究。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jun;30(5):451-60. doi: 10.1177/1545968315604397. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
6
The Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples.抑郁焦虑压力量表21项意大利语版:社区和临床样本的因子结构及心理测量特性
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;60:170-81. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Impact of spatial neglect on stroke rehabilitation: evidence from the setting of an inpatient rehabilitation facility.空间忽视对脑卒中康复的影响:来自一家住院康复机构的证据。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8):1458-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
8
Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living.凯斯勒基金会疏忽评估流程专门用于测量日常生活活动中的空间疏忽。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):869-876.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
The impact of recovery of visuo-spatial neglect on motor recovery of the upper paretic limb after stroke.卒中后视觉空间忽视的恢复对上肢偏瘫肢体运动恢复的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 20;9(6):e100584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100584. eCollection 2014.
10
Functional assessment of region-specific neglect: are there differential behavioural consequences of peripersonal versus extrapersonal neglect?区域特异性忽视的功能评估:近体忽视与远体忽视是否存在不同的行为后果?
Behav Neurol. 2014;2014:526407. doi: 10.1155/2014/526407. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

空间忽视的传统与功能评估:临床实践建议

Conventional and functional assessment of spatial neglect: Clinical practice suggestions.

作者信息

Pitteri Marco, Chen Peii, Passarini Laura, Albanese Silvia, Meneghello Francesca, Barrett A M

机构信息

Neurology Section, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona.

Kessler Foundation.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2018 Oct;32(7):835-842. doi: 10.1037/neu0000469. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1037/neu0000469
PMID:29975073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6188804/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Spatial neglect (SN) constitutes a substantial barrier to functional recovery after acquired brain injury. However, because of its multimodal nature, no single test can capture all the signs of SN. To provide a clinically feasible solution, we used conventional neuropsychological tests as well as the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) via the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP). The goal was to add evidence that a global approach should detect better even subtle signs of SN.

METHOD

Fourteen individuals with lesions located in the right cerebral hemisphere participated in the study. Participants were assessed with a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests, comprising a set of visuospatial tests to evaluate several spatial domains. In addition, patients underwent functional assessment with the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the CBS via KF-NAP.

RESULTS

The CBS via KF-NAP was associated with the visuospatial paper-based tests (p = .004) as well as the Motor FIM (p = .003), and was more sensitive than the Behavioral Inattention Test-Conventional in detecting SN (p = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that the CBS via KF-NAP was able: (a) to detect functional impairment, especially motor, related to SN; (b) to selectively measures spatial rather than nonspatial dysfunctions; and (c) to be highly sensitive in detecting SN signs especially in those patients with mild severity, covering several aspects of SN manifestations. The patient's SN diagnosis based on the CBS via KF-NAP is clinically important and directly relevant to care planning and goal setting. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

空间忽视是获得性脑损伤后功能恢复的重大障碍。然而,由于其多模态性质,没有单一测试能够捕捉空间忽视的所有迹象。为了提供一种临床可行的解决方案,我们使用了传统神经心理学测试以及通过凯斯勒基金会忽视评估流程(KF-NAP)进行的凯瑟琳·贝热戈量表(CBS)评估。目的是补充证据,证明采用全面方法能够更好地检测出空间忽视的细微迹象。

方法

14名右半球有损伤的个体参与了该研究。参与者接受了一系列全面的神经心理学测试,包括一组视觉空间测试以评估多个空间领域。此外,患者通过KF-NAP接受了巴氏指数、功能独立性测量(FIM)和CBS的功能评估。

结果

通过KF-NAP进行的CBS评估与基于纸质的视觉空间测试相关(p = 0.004)以及与运动FIM相关(p = 0.003),并且在检测空间忽视方面比传统行为疏忽测试更敏感(p = 0.014)。

结论

我们表明,通过KF-NAP进行的CBS评估能够:(a)检测与空间忽视相关的功能损害,尤其是运动功能损害;(b)选择性地测量空间而非非空间功能障碍;(c)在检测空间忽视迹象方面具有高度敏感性,尤其是在轻度严重程度的患者中,涵盖了空间忽视表现的多个方面。基于通过KF-NAP进行的CBS评估对患者的空间忽视诊断在临床上具有重要意义,并且与护理计划和目标设定直接相关。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2018美国心理学会,保留所有权利)