Nadalin Victoria, Mustard Cameron, Smith Peter M
Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, Canada.
Saf Health Work. 2021 Dec;12(4):471-478. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
Employment standards (ES) include having a regular payday, regular breaks, the right to paid sick or vacation time, and paid wages. Inadequate ES contribute to the labour market vulnerability of workers; however, they are not typically considered to be risk factors for workplace injury. In a sample of Canadian workers, we examine the risk of injury associated with inadequate ES, independent of, and combined with inadequate workplace protections from workplace hazards.
Data from 2,803 adults working 15 hours or more/week in workplaces with at least five employees were analysed. We explored associations between exposure to workplace hazards with inadequate protections [termed occupational health and safety (OHS) vulnerability] and inadequate ES on workplace injury (physical or mental injury; injury requiring time off). Additive interaction models were used to examine the independent and combined effects of these exposures.
Occupational health and safety vulnerability and inadequate ES were independently associated with increased injury outcomes. Adjusted models showed an additive relationship for all injury outcomes between OHS vulnerability and inadequate ES. Statistically significant superadditive relationships were observed for physical injury risk with policy and procedure vulnerability plus inadequate ES [synergy index (S) 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13-2.00] and for overall OHS vulnerability inadequate ES (S 1.53, 95% CI: 1.16-2.02), suggesting a combined effect greater than independent effects.
Occupational health and safety vulnerability and inadequate ES are independently associated with workplace injury. For certain injury outcomes, the combined effect of OHS vulnerability and inadequate ES is greater than the independent effects of each individual exposure.
就业标准(ES)包括固定发薪日、定期休息、享有带薪病假或休假时间以及获得有薪工资。就业标准不足会导致工人在劳动力市场中处于弱势地位;然而,它们通常不被视为工作场所受伤的风险因素。在一组加拿大工人样本中,我们研究了与就业标准不足相关的受伤风险,该风险独立于工作场所危害防护不足,并与之相结合。
对来自至少有五名员工的工作场所、每周工作15小时或以上的2803名成年人的数据进行了分析。我们探讨了暴露于防护不足的工作场所危害(称为职业健康与安全(OHS)脆弱性)和就业标准不足与工作场所受伤(身体或精神伤害;需要休假的伤害)之间的关联。使用相加交互作用模型来检验这些暴露因素的独立和综合影响。
职业健康与安全脆弱性和就业标准不足均与受伤结果增加独立相关。调整后的模型显示,职业健康与安全脆弱性和就业标准不足之间在所有受伤结果方面均存在相加关系。在政策和程序脆弱性加上就业标准不足导致身体受伤风险方面(协同指数(S)为1.50,95%置信区间:1.13 - 2.00)以及在整体职业健康与安全脆弱性加上就业标准不足方面(S为1.53,95%置信区间:1.16 - 2.02)观察到具有统计学意义的超相加关系,表明综合效应大于独立效应。
职业健康与安全脆弱性和就业标准不足与工作场所受伤独立相关。对于某些受伤结果,职业健康与安全脆弱性和就业标准不足的综合效应大于各单独暴露因素的独立效应。