Suppr超能文献

[尿道周围区域的刺激或阻断——膀胱过度活动症和急迫性尿失禁保守治疗措施的扩展]

[Stimulation or blocking of the periurethral region--an expansion of conservative therapeutic measures in irritable bladder and urge incontinence].

作者信息

Hopp H, Combes H J

出版信息

Zentralbl Gynakol. 1986;108(14):851-6.

PMID:3490077
Abstract

In an open study we report about the therapeutic influence of neural therapy in the periurethral region in patients with urgency. We treated 50 patients with neurohormonal urgency three times in 2-weeks interval by periurethral injections of 10 ml 0.25% Bupivacaine. Success was controlled in 46 patients with clinical and urodynamical methods. 10% of the least one time treated patients had the same complaints after therapy, 60% were improved by therapy and 30% were free of symptoms. We registered with urodynamic measurements a significant increase of the bladder volume up to the first sensation to void and a significant reduction of the bladder compliance. In a second randomized study the influence of a single acute maximum functional electrostimulation (AMFES) by vaginal electrode was tested. 10 patients with anamnestic urge incontinence in each case with uninhibited detrusor contractions and 10 patients without detrusor contractions was treated. The subjective statements yielded in urge incontinence without detrusor contractions a higher percentage of improvement than in motoric urge incontinence. The urodynamic diagnostic evaluation showed a relation between the unchanged objective conditions and the symptoms of complaint four weeks after treatment in patients with motoric urge incontinence. We recommend the use both of the neural therapy and functional electrostimulation as additional methods besides the dominant medicamentous treatment of the urgency and the urge incontinence.

摘要

在一项开放性研究中,我们报告了神经疗法对尿急患者尿道周围区域的治疗影响。我们对50例患有神经激素性尿急的患者,每隔2周进行3次尿道周围注射10毫升0.25%布比卡因的治疗。采用临床和尿动力学方法对46例患者的治疗效果进行了评估。至少接受过一次治疗的患者中,10%在治疗后仍有相同症状,60%症状有所改善,30%症状消失。通过尿动力学测量,我们记录到直至首次有排尿感觉时膀胱容量显著增加,膀胱顺应性显著降低。在第二项随机研究中,测试了通过阴道电极进行单次急性最大功能电刺激(AMFES)的影响。对10例有急迫性尿失禁病史且逼尿肌无抑制性收缩的患者和10例无逼尿肌收缩的患者进行了治疗。主观陈述显示,在无逼尿肌收缩的急迫性尿失禁患者中,症状改善的比例高于运动性急迫性尿失禁患者。尿动力学诊断评估显示,运动性急迫性尿失禁患者在治疗四周后,客观情况未改变与主诉症状之间存在关联。我们建议,除了对尿急和急迫性尿失禁进行主要的药物治疗外,还应将神经疗法和功能性电刺激作为辅助方法使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验