Suppr超能文献

评价添加抗癫痫药物治疗后的患者的持续治疗情况和医疗保健利用度:韩国全国范围内的队列研究。

Evaluation of persistence and healthcare utilization in patients treated with anti-seizure medications as add-on therapy: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea.

机构信息

Medical, Eisai Korea Inc., 6 Bongeunsa-ro 86-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Real World Insights, IQVIA Korea, 173 Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Jan;126:108459. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108459. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare medication adherence and healthcare utilization among patients who were treated with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) as first add-on to monotherapy for epilepsy using the national health insurance claims data.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Patients who received ASM as first add-on to monotherapy during January 2017 to February 2018 were included. The selected patients were followed up for 12 months to evaluate persistence, adherence, and healthcare resource utilization.

RESULTS

In total, 4277 patients who received ASM as first add-on to monotherapy for epilepsy were enrolled. The mean treatment duration of add-on ASM was 296.6 ± 108.6 days during the 1-year follow-up period and 64.3% of the total population were persistent on the add-on ASM at 365 days from the index date. The mean medication possession ratio (MPR) was 90.3 ± 23.7 and the proportion of adherent patients with ≥80% MPR was 79.3%. Lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and perampanel (PER) groups showed significantly higher persistence and adherence than carbamazepine (CBZ), topiramate (TPM), and valproate (VAL) groups during the 1-year follow-up period. Significant differences in length of stays, total hospitalization cost, outpatient visit cost, and emergency cost were shown between ASM groups and LTG, LEV, OXC, and PER showed relatively low utilization and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Better adherence was observed in LTG, LEV, OXC, and PER groups than in CBZ, TPM, and VAL groups. Healthcare utilization and related costs showed significant difference between ASM groups.

摘要

目的

利用国家健康保险索赔数据比较癫痫患者接受抗癫痫药物(ASM)作为一线附加治疗的药物依从性和医疗保健利用情况。

方法

使用韩国国家健康保险索赔数据进行回顾性观察队列研究。纳入在 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 2 月期间接受 ASM 作为一线附加治疗的患者。选择的患者接受了 12 个月的随访,以评估持续性、依从性和医疗资源利用情况。

结果

共纳入 4277 例接受 ASM 作为一线附加治疗的癫痫患者。在 1 年随访期间,附加 ASM 的平均治疗持续时间为 296.6±108.6 天,从索引日期起的 365 天内,总人群中有 64.3%的患者持续使用附加 ASM。平均药物暴露率(MPR)为 90.3±23.7,≥80%MPR 的依从性患者比例为 79.3%。拉莫三嗪(LTG)、左乙拉西坦(LEV)、奥卡西平(OXC)和吡仑帕奈(PER)组在 1 年随访期间的持续性和依从性均明显高于卡马西平(CBZ)、托吡酯(TPM)和丙戊酸钠(VAL)组。ASM 组之间的住院时间、总住院费用、门诊费用和急诊费用存在显著差异,LTG、LEV、OXC 和 PER 组的利用率和费用相对较低。

结论

LTG、LEV、OXC 和 PER 组的依从性优于 CBZ、TPM 和 VAL 组。ASM 组之间的医疗保健利用率和相关费用存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验