Suppr超能文献

考察口吃和社交焦虑对青少年解读模糊社交情境的影响。

Examining the Effects of Stuttering and Social Anxiety on Interpretations of Ambiguous Social Scenarios Among Adolescents.

机构信息

Department of Special Education and Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln United States.

Youth Resilience Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London England.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 2022 Jan-Feb;95:106179. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106179. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The proclivity to construe ambiguous information in a negative way is known as interpretation bias, which has been implicated in the onset and/or maintenance of social anxiety. The purpose of this study was to examine group and individual differences in interpretation bias among young people who stutter and their typically fluent peers during the adolescent years when social fears and worries tend to escalate.

METHODS

A total of 99 adolescents (13 to 19 years old) participated, including 48 adolescents who stutter (67% male) and 51 typically fluent controls (68% male). They completed a computerized vignette-based interpretation bias task in which they first read 14 short ambiguous social scenarios (half including a verbal interaction, half including a non-verbal interaction). They were then presented with four possible interpretations of each scenario including two negative interpretations (one target, one foil) and two positive interpretations (one target, one foil). Participants used a 4-point Likert scale to rate how similar in meaning each interpretation was to the original scenario. Participants also completed self-report measures of social and general anxiety, and provided a speech sample for stuttering analysis.

RESULTS

There was no effect of stuttering on interpretations; the adolescents who stutter rated interpretations across both verbal and non-verbal scenarios comparably to the controls, and stuttering severity did not affect interpretation ratings. However, across groups, there was a significant effect of social anxiety such that higher social anxiety was associated with more negative interpretations, and lower social anxiety was associated with more positive interpretations.

DISCUSSION

This study provides preliminary evidence that social anxiety may affect how adolescents interpret ambiguous social cues in verbal and non-verbal scenarios more than stuttering, although more research into how people who stutter process social information is warranted.

摘要

目的

将模棱两可的信息解读为负面倾向的倾向被称为解释偏差,它与社交焦虑的发生和/或维持有关。本研究的目的是在青少年时期(社交恐惧和担忧倾向于加剧的时期),检查口吃青少年与他们的典型流畅同龄人之间的解释偏差的群体和个体差异。

方法

共有 99 名青少年(13 至 19 岁)参与了研究,其中包括 48 名口吃青少年(67%为男性)和 51 名典型流畅对照组(68%为男性)。他们完成了一个基于计算机的情景解释偏差任务,首先阅读 14 个简短的模棱两可的社交情景(一半包括言语互动,一半包括非言语互动)。然后,他们对每个情景的四个可能解释进行评分,包括两个负面解释(一个目标,一个干扰)和两个正面解释(一个目标,一个干扰)。参与者使用 4 点李克特量表来评估每个解释与原始情景的相似程度。参与者还完成了社交和一般焦虑的自我报告测量,并提供了口吃分析的演讲样本。

结果

口吃对解释没有影响;口吃青少年对言语和非言语情景的解释与对照组相似,口吃严重程度也不影响解释评分。然而,在所有组中,社交焦虑都有显著的影响,即社交焦虑越高,与更多的负面解释相关,社交焦虑越低,与更多的正面解释相关。

讨论

这项研究初步表明,社交焦虑可能比口吃更能影响青少年对言语和非言语情景中模棱两可的社交线索的解释,尽管需要更多的研究来探究口吃者如何处理社交信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验