College of Health and Human Services, Motion Analysis and Integrative Neurophysiology Lab, University of Toledo, OH.
Department of Athletic Training, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, NC.
J Athl Train. 2022 Jul 1;57(7):672-677. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-523-21.
Running programs traditionally monitor external loads (eg, time and distance). Recent efforts have encouraged a more comprehensive approach to also account for internal loads (eg, intensity, measured as the session rating of perceived exertion [sRPE]). The combination of external and internal loads accounts for the possible interaction between these loads. Although weekly changes in training loads have been reported between external loads and the combination of external and internal loads during 2- and 4-week training cycles, no authors have indicated whether these differences occur during an entire cross-country season in high school runners.
To compare changes in training loads, as measured by (1) external loads and (2) combined external and internal loads in high school runners during an interscholastic cross-country season.
Case series.
Community-based setting with daily online surveys.
Twenty-four high school cross-country runners (females = 14, males = 10, age = 15.9 ± 1.1 years, running experience = 9.9 ± 3.2 years).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Week-to-week percentage changes in training load were measured by external loads (time, distance) and combined external and internal loads (time × sRPE [timeRPE] and distance × sRPE [distanceRPE]).
Overall, the average weekly change was 7.1% greater for distanceRPE than for distance (P = .04, d = 0.18). When the weekly running duration decreased, we found the average weekly change was 5.2% greater for distanceRPE than for timeRPE (P = .03, d = 0.24). When the weekly running duration was maintained or increased, the average weekly change was 10% to 15% greater when external and internal loads were combined versus external loads alone, but these differences were nonsignificant (P = .11-.22, d = 0.19-0.34).
Progression in the training load may be underestimated when relying solely on external loads. The interaction between internal loads (sRPE) and external loads (distance or time) appears to provide a different measure of the training stresses experienced by runners than external loads alone.
传统上,跑步程序会监控外部负荷(例如时间和距离)。最近的研究工作鼓励采用更全面的方法来考虑内部负荷(例如强度,以会话感知用力评分[session rating of perceived exertion,sRPE]来衡量)。外部负荷和内部负荷的组合可以解释这些负荷之间的可能相互作用。尽管在 2 至 4 周的训练周期中,已经报告了外部负荷和外部与内部负荷的组合之间每周训练负荷的变化,但没有作者表明这些差异是否在高中跑步者的整个越野赛季中发生。
比较高中越野跑运动员在一个校际越野赛季中,(1)外部负荷和(2)外部与内部负荷组合的训练负荷变化。
病例系列。
基于社区的环境,每天进行在线调查。
24 名高中越野跑运动员(女性=14 名,男性=10 名,年龄=15.9±1.1 岁,跑步经验=9.9±3.2 年)。
通过外部负荷(时间、距离)和外部与内部负荷的组合(时间×sRPE[timeRPE]和距离×sRPE[distanceRPE])测量训练负荷的每周百分比变化。
总体而言,distanceRPE 的每周平均变化比 distance 高 7.1%(P=0.04,d=0.18)。当每周跑步时间减少时,我们发现 distanceRPE 的每周平均变化比 timeRPE 高 5.2%(P=0.03,d=0.24)。当每周跑步时间保持或增加时,与仅使用外部负荷相比,当组合使用外部和内部负荷时,每周的平均变化增加了 10%至 15%,但这些差异无统计学意义(P=0.11-0.22,d=0.19-0.34)。
仅依靠外部负荷可能会低估训练负荷的进展。内部负荷(sRPE)与外部负荷(距离或时间)之间的相互作用似乎为跑步者所经历的训练压力提供了一种与仅使用外部负荷不同的衡量标准。