Medical Clinic, Department of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Eur J Haematol. 2022 Mar;108(3):244-263. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13732. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are part of the sequential FLAMSA-reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen to cure high risk myeloid neoplasia with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although DLI themselves carry significant risks, their prophylactic use has not been analyzed in a time-dependent manner. One hundred and fourteen patients underwent FLAMSA-RIC HSCT between 2013 and 2020. Next to Kaplan-Meier estimation of overall, disease-free, and graft-versus-host relapse-free survival (OS, DFS, GRFS), cumulative incidences of relapse and death in remission were calculated in a competing risk model. Additionally, the contribution of prophylactic and preemptive DLI as time-dependent covariates was assessed using a time-varying model toward DFS (Simon-Makuch method, Mantel-Byar test). At 2 years, OS was 45.2% [95% CI 36.7-55.7%], DFS 31.8% [95% CI 24-42.2%] and GRFS 11.3 [95% CI 6.5-19.8]. Neither prophylactic nor preemptive DLI showed a significant influence on DFS when considered time-dependent covariates (Mantel-Byar, p = .3). This was further corroborated in competing risk analysis with DLI as time-dependent covariates. Both prophylactic and preemptive DLI miss significance in their impact on survival within a high-risk cohort in a time-varying model. Controlled trials to address the impact of postgrafting immunotherapy approaches are needed.
预防性供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)是降低 FLAMSA 强度的序贯预处理方案的一部分,用于异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)治疗高危髓系肿瘤。尽管 DLI 本身存在很大风险,但尚未对其进行时间依赖性分析。114 例患者于 2013 年至 2020 年期间接受了 FLAMSA-RIC HSCT。除了使用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计总体、无病和移植物抗宿主病无复发存活率(OS、DFS、GRFS)外,还在竞争风险模型中计算缓解期复发和死亡的累积发生率。此外,还使用时变模型(Simon-Makuch 法、Mantel-Byar 检验)对预防性和抢先性 DLI 作为时间依赖性协变量对 DFS 的贡献进行评估。2 年时,OS 为 45.2%[95%CI 36.7-55.7%],DFS 为 31.8%[95%CI 24-42.2%],GRFS 为 11.3%[95%CI 6.5-19.8%]。当考虑时间依赖性协变量时,预防性和抢先性 DLI 对 DFS 均无显著影响(Mantel-Byar,p=0.3)。在时变模型中,将 DLI 作为时间依赖性协变量进行竞争风险分析时,结果也是如此。在高危队列中,无论是预防性还是抢先性 DLI,在时变模型中对生存的影响均无统计学意义。需要进行对照试验来确定移植后免疫治疗方法的影响。