Department of Medicine II, Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Klinikum Augsburg, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Stenglinstr.2, 86156 Augsburg, Munich, Germany.
Department of Medicine III, Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ann Hematol. 2019 Mar;98(3):753-762. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03593-2. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), primary refractory or relapsed disease, secondary AML, and leukemia with unfavorable genetics are considered high-risk AML (hrAML), with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) representing the standard treatment. Sequential conditioning has been successfully used for SCT in hrAML in HLA-matched transplants, and found its way into HLA-haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT) later on. Hence, sequential conditioning had become standard for all patients with hrAML in our two centers, regardless of donor type. Thereby, HLA-matched family or unrelated transplants were first/second choice, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY)-based haplo-SCT was chosen in patients missing matched donors or requiring urgent transplantation. To compare the outcome after HLA-matched and haplo-SCT for hrAML following sequential conditioning, we performed a retrospective, matched-pair comparison, using disease stage, genetic subgroups and age as matching criteria. Thirty-four well-matched pairs were identified. At SCT, patients (median age 54 years) were untreated (9%), had remission (13%), or active disease (78%). Three-year overall and leukemia-free survival (OS/LFS) of the entire cohort was 56 ± 7%/49 ± 7%, without significant differences between donor types (OS after HLA-matched/haplo-SCT 62 ± 10%/52 ± 9% (p = 0.21), LFS 53 ± 10%/46 ± 9% (p = 0.26)). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse-mortality and chronic GvHD, as well as GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), and chronic GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (cGRFS), were comparable. However, a higher incidence of acute GvHD ≥ II° was observed after HLA-matched SCT (15 ± 1% versus 50 ± 2%, p = 0.001). In conclusion, sequential conditioning SCT achieved remarkable results in hrAML, independently from donor type. PTCY-based haplo-SCT produced results that were comparable to HLA-matched SCT and can be used as an alternative option.
在急性髓细胞白血病 (AML) 中,原发性难治或复发疾病、继发性 AML 和遗传不良的白血病被认为是高危 AML (hrAML),异基因干细胞移植 (SCT) 是标准治疗方法。序贯预处理已成功应用于 HLA 匹配移植中的 hrAML SCT,并随后应用于 HLA 单倍体相合 SCT (haplo-SCT)。因此,序贯预处理已成为我们两个中心所有 hrAML 患者的标准治疗方法,无论供者类型如何。因此,HLA 匹配的亲属或无关供者移植是首选/次选,在缺乏匹配供者或需要紧急移植的患者中选择基于环磷酰胺 (PTCY) 的 haplo-SCT。为了比较 HLA 匹配和 haplo-SCT 治疗序贯预处理后高危 AML 的结果,我们进行了回顾性、配对比较,使用疾病分期、遗传亚组和年龄作为匹配标准。确定了 34 对匹配良好的患者。在 SCT 时,患者(中位年龄 54 岁)未治疗(9%)、缓解(13%)或活动疾病(78%)。整个队列的 3 年总生存率和无白血病生存率(OS/LFS)分别为 56 ± 7%/49 ± 7%,两种供者类型之间无显著差异(HLA 匹配/ haplo-SCT 后的 OS 分别为 62 ± 10%/52 ± 9%(p = 0.21),LFS 分别为 53 ± 10%/46 ± 9%(p = 0.26))。同样,复发、非复发死亡率和慢性移植物抗宿主病的累积发生率,以及无复发生存率(GRFS)和无慢性移植物抗宿主病、无复发生存(cGRFS)也相似。然而,HLA 匹配 SCT 后观察到急性 GvHD ≥ II°的发生率较高(15 ± 1%对 50 ± 2%,p = 0.001)。总之,序贯预处理 SCT 无论供者类型如何,在 hrAML 中均取得了显著效果。基于 PTCY 的 haplo-SCT 产生的结果与 HLA 匹配 SCT 相当,可作为替代选择。