Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Nov;51 Suppl 2:S62-S65. doi: 10.1002/hast.1321.
Designing broad public deliberation is challenging. In addition, participants of public deliberation are guided by their cultural norms, values, and rules. This creates a tension between the goal of practical approaches to broad public deliberation and how individuals perceive issues and relate to others in the world. Despite such challenges, we must continue to create opportunities for the public to deliberate about and provide input into the regulation of emerging technologies. Therefore, previously imagined approaches to broad public deliberation should be reevaluated to better utilize the information gained during the process and expand the range of ideas incorporated into decision-making. To do this, institutions must consider how the public makes sense of complex issues concerning cultural conflict. This article introduces a framework that demonstrates how cultural theory can be used for rethinking previous approaches to public deliberation. In doing so, it offers guidelines for designing public deliberation involving distinct public participation venues based on different worldviews.
设计广泛的公众审议具有挑战性。此外,公众审议的参与者受到其文化规范、价值观和规则的指导。这在广泛的公众审议的实践方法的目标和个人如何看待问题以及与世界上其他人的关系之间造成了紧张关系。尽管存在这些挑战,但我们必须继续为公众提供机会,让他们就新兴技术的监管进行审议并提供意见。因此,以前想象的广泛公众审议方法应该重新评估,以更好地利用在此过程中获得的信息,并扩大纳入决策的想法范围。为此,各机构必须考虑公众如何理解涉及文化冲突的复杂问题。本文介绍了一个框架,展示了如何使用文化理论重新思考以前的公众审议方法。这样做,它提供了基于不同世界观的不同公众参与场所的公众审议设计指南。