Suppr超能文献

[死亡权利与协助自杀:综述与批判性分析]

[The right to die and assisted suicide: Review and critical analysis].

作者信息

Dalfin W, Guymard M, Kieffer P, Kahn J-P

机构信息

Centre psychothérapique de Nancy, CHRU Nancy, 25, rue Lionnois, 54000 Nancy, France.

CHS Ravenel, 1115, avenue René-Porterat, 88500 Mirecourt, France.

出版信息

Encephale. 2022 Apr;48(2):196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Dec 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In the context of the present re-examination of the French bioethical laws by the National Advisory Ethics Committee ("Comité consultatif national d'éthique": CCNE), a recent survey indicated a request of the public opinion to obtain a medical aid in end of life and a so-called "assisted suicide". This led psychiatrists to re-consider their role and deontological position which usually led them to consider a request for an assistance in suicide as - a priori - a pathological demand, occurring within a suicidal crisis. The present article intends to: 1) describe the laws and practices of countries which allow medically assisted end of life help procedures; 2) clarify the definitions of "assisted suicide", "assistance to suicide" and "euthanasia"; 3) consider available epidemiological data and the roles given to doctors and, more specifically psychiatrists, in these procedures; 4) analyse the rationale behind these demands. These considerations should enable French psychiatrists to clarify their position when facing requests for a medical aid in dying.

METHODS

Four European countries (Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg) and Oregon (the first US state to introduce legislation) were considered, since they accumulated and published a large amount of experiences and data about "assisted suicide" and medical help in dying. In total, 127 articles were selected, mainly from PubMed and Cairn databases, published between 1997 and 2020. These articles deal with legal considerations, epidemiological data, ethical and sociological considerations.

RESULTS

Laws and practices differ notably according to the state/country. In Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxemburg, as in Oregon, the medical help in dying has been de-criminalized, as long as certain legal criteria are met. In Switzerland, where no specific law exists in the penal code, non-governmental associations have benefited from the legal vacuum and organized the practice of "assisted suicide" for "altruistic motives". In the scientific and legal literature, the terms used to describe and define the medical help in dying upon request differ greatly. In France, the National Advisory Ethics Committee defines euthanasia ("euthanasie"), assisted suicide ("suicide assisté") and suicide assistance ("assistance au suicide"). Available epidemiological data, whatever the country considered, indicate that requests for a medical aid in dying are expressed mainly by patients aged over 60 years and suffering from cancer. Psychiatric diseases account for only 1% to 3%. Most often, systematic assessment by a psychiatrist is neither requested nor made, when the demand does not occur during a primary psychiatric illness. In the case of an existing primary psychiatric pathology, a psychiatrist assesses the case against formal legal predefined criteria. This latter practice was only recently introduced, after some feedback and after legal actions had been brought to Court. When the underlying motivations of the request are considered, it appears that, even in the absence of an evolving psychiatric condition, several psychological or psychopathological reasons prevail such as spirituality, attachment style, social isolation, despair, depression… which should greatly benefit psychiatric exploration, investigation and expertise.

CONCLUSION

In some countries, the request for medically assisted help in dying has become a legal and social reality. In France, where the public debate is still open, it should be emphasized that a psychiatric assessment and interview should be systematically provided to any person requesting medical assistance to die or commit suicide. It is the commitment of psychiatrists to understand the implicit demands and unexpressed motives underlying this request which have strong links with the unique life-events and emotional experiences of the person. The psychiatrist has a unique role in the contextualization of such a request.

摘要

目的

在国家咨询伦理委员会(“Comité consultatif national d'éthique”:CCNE)对法国生物伦理法进行重新审查的背景下,最近的一项调查表明,公众希望获得临终医疗援助以及所谓的“协助自杀”。这促使精神科医生重新审视他们的角色和道义立场,以往他们通常将协助自杀的请求——先验地——视为在自杀危机中出现的一种病态需求。本文旨在:1)描述允许实施医疗协助临终帮助程序的国家的法律和实践;2)阐明“协助自杀”“自杀援助”和“安乐死”的定义;3)考量现有的流行病学数据以及医生,尤其是精神科医生在这些程序中所扮演的角色;4)分析这些需求背后的基本原理。这些考量应能使法国精神科医生在面对临终医疗援助请求时明确自身立场。

方法

考虑了四个欧洲国家(瑞士、荷兰、比利时、卢森堡)以及俄勒冈州(美国首个引入相关立法的州),因为它们积累并公布了大量关于“协助自杀”和临终医疗帮助的经验及数据。总共挑选了127篇文章,主要来自PubMed和Cairn数据库,发表时间在1997年至2020年之间。这些文章涉及法律考量、流行病学数据、伦理和社会学考量。

结果

法律和实践因国家/州而异。在比利时、荷兰和卢森堡,与俄勒冈州一样,只要满足某些法律标准,临终医疗帮助已被合法化。在瑞士,刑法中没有具体法律规定,非政府组织利用了法律空白,组织了出于“利他动机”的“协助自杀”行为。在科学和法律文献中,用于描述和定义应请求提供的临终医疗帮助的术语差异很大。在法国,国家咨询伦理委员会对安乐死(“euthanasie”)、协助自杀(“suicide assisté”)和自杀援助(“assistance au suicide”)进行了定义。无论考虑哪个国家,现有的流行病学数据表明,临终医疗援助请求主要由60岁以上且患有癌症的患者提出。精神疾病仅占1%至3%。大多数情况下,当请求并非在原发性精神疾病期间提出时,既不会要求也不会进行精神科医生的系统评估。在存在原发性精神病理学的情况下,精神科医生会根据正式的法律预定义标准对病例进行评估。这种做法是在一些反馈以及法律诉讼提交至法院后,才于近期引入的。当考虑请求的潜在动机时,似乎即使不存在不断演变的精神状况,一些心理或精神病理学原因也占主导,如精神性、依恋风格、社会孤立、绝望、抑郁……这将极大地有助于精神科的探索、调查和专业判断。

结论

在一些国家,请求医疗协助临终帮助已成为一种法律和社会现实。在法国,公众辩论仍在进行,应当强调,对于任何请求医疗协助死亡或自杀的人,都应系统地提供精神科评估和面谈。理解该请求背后隐含的需求和未表达的动机是精神科医生的职责,这些动机与该人的独特生活事件和情感经历密切相关。精神科医生在将此类请求置于具体情境中时具有独特作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验