Blot François, Fremaux Margot, Mateus Christine
Comité d'éthique, médecine intensive réanimation, département interdisciplinaire d'organisation des parcours patients, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, département d'anesthésie - réanimation, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Bull Cancer. 2023 Mar;110(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
In its advice No. 139 entitled "Ethical issues related to end-of-life situations: autonomy and solidarity", the National Ethics Committee opens for the first time in France the way to a possible active assistance in dying (assisted suicide or euthanasia). Such an ethical, legal and medical evolution would have major consequences in the palliative approach proposed to cancer patients. This clarification aims to enlighten the reflection, in a very complex societal debate. About thirty issues of the supporters and opponents of the legalization of active assistance in dying are first detailed. The values of autonomy and freedom are confronted with those of medical care and solidarity; the individual approach clashes with the collective interest; the interest of the patient and the place of the physician are considered from different angles. Finally, we propose a reflective path, in order to examine step by step the stakes, by examining successively the diagnosis of end of life conditions in France, then the questions asked and the proposals about: suicide; the principle of active assistance in dying; the procedures for reviewing a request for active assistance in dying; the modalities of implementation (assisted suicide or euthanasia); the place of the physician as agent of this decision. Only an analytical approach will make it possible to avoid amalgams and cognitive biases in a debate that closely mixes rationality and emotions.
在其第139号建议《与临终状况相关的伦理问题:自主性与团结》中,法国国家伦理委员会首次在法国为可能的积极协助死亡(协助自杀或安乐死)开辟了道路。这样一种伦理、法律和医学上的演变将对向癌症患者提供的姑息治疗方法产生重大影响。这一阐释旨在在一场非常复杂的社会辩论中启发思考。首先详细阐述了支持和反对积极协助死亡合法化的大约三十个问题。自主性和自由的价值观与医疗护理和团结的价值观相对抗;个体方法与集体利益相冲突;从不同角度审视患者的利益和医生的角色。最后,我们提出一条思考路径,以便通过依次审视法国临终状况的诊断,然后是关于自杀、积极协助死亡原则、审查积极协助死亡请求的程序、实施方式(协助自杀或安乐死)、医生作为这一决定执行者的角色等方面所提出的问题和建议,逐步审视其中的利害关系。只有一种分析性的方法才能在一场将理性与情感紧密交织的辩论中避免混淆和认知偏差。