Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 14;11(1):23921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03154-6.
Vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) are key biomarkers considered to be associated with vaccine efficacy. In United States government-sponsored phase 3 efficacy trials of COVID-19 vaccines, nAbs are measured by two different validated pseudovirus-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays, with each trial using one of the two assays. Here we describe and compare the nAb titers obtained in the two assays. We observe that one assay consistently yielded higher nAb titers than the other when both assays were performed on the World Health Organization's anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin International Standard, COVID-19 convalescent sera, and mRNA-1273 vaccinee sera. To overcome the challenge this difference in readout poses in comparing/combining data from the two assays, we evaluate three calibration approaches and show that readouts from the two assays can be calibrated to a common scale. These results may aid decision-making based on data from these assays for the evaluation and licensure of new or adapted COVID-19 vaccines.
疫苗诱导的中和抗体(nAbs)被认为与疫苗效力相关,是关键的生物标志物。在美国政府资助的 COVID-19 疫苗 3 期功效试验中,nAbs 通过两种不同的经验证的基于假病毒的 SARS-CoV-2 中和测定法进行测量,每个试验使用两种测定法之一。在这里,我们描述并比较了两种测定法中获得的 nAb 效价。我们观察到,当两种测定法均在世界卫生组织的抗 SARS-CoV-2 免疫球蛋白国际标准、COVID-19 恢复期血清和 mRNA-1273 疫苗接种者血清上进行时,一种测定法始终比另一种测定法产生更高的 nAb 效价。为了克服在比较/组合两种测定法的数据时这种读数差异带来的挑战,我们评估了三种校准方法,并表明可以将两种测定法的读数校准到共同的标度。这些结果可能有助于根据这些测定法的数据做出决策,以评估和许可新的或适应性 COVID-19 疫苗。