Suppr超能文献

阿育吠陀-64作为无症状和轻症新冠肺炎病例标准治疗的附加疗法:一项随机对照试验。

AYUSH-64 as an add-on to standard care in asymptomatic and mild cases of COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Reddy R Govind, Gosavi Rajesh Vithal, Yadav Babita, Rai Amit Kumar, Holay Madhuri Prashant, Talekar Manisha, Jameela Sophia, Sharma Bhagwan Sahay, Khanduri Shruti, Rana Rakesh, Tripathi Arunabh, Chandrasekhararao Bhogavalli, Srikanth Narayanam, Dhiman Kartar S

机构信息

Department of Ayurveda, Regional Ayurveda Research Institute, Nagpur, India.

Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Ayu. 2020 Apr-Jun;41(2):107-116. doi: 10.4103/ayu.ayu_14_21. Epub 2021 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evidence on the efficacy and safety of Ayurveda interventions as an add-on to the standard conventional care for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is limited.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

This study was planned to explore the potential of AYUSH-64 as an add-on to conventional care in improving the clinical recovery and negative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) conversion in asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An open-label randomized controlled study was conducted at Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, with a sample size of 60 participants. In this study, asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients were randomized and allocated into intervention and control groups (CG) in a 1:1 ratio. AYUSH-64 two capsules (500 mg each) were administered thrice daily, after food with water for 30 days along with standard care in the intervention group (IG), while the CG received only standard care. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who turned RT-PCR negative for COVID-19 at 7, 15, 22 and 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants who attained clinical recovery at 7, 15, 22 and 30 days, change in laboratory parameters on the 30 day and incidence of adverse drug reactions/adverse events. The data were compared within group using paired sample -test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test and between group using independent sample -test/Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference was not observed in the proportion of participants who turned RT-PCR negative during each of the follow-ups ( = 0.134) and both groups demonstrated comparable efficacy. The clinical recovery in terms of complete relief in symptoms in the symptomatic participants was 60% and 37% on day 15 ( = 0.098) and 100% and 85.2% on day 30 ( = 0.112) in the intervention and CG, respectively. The improvement in the inflammatory markers such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and D-dimer was statistically significant ( < 0.05) in the IG, whereas in the CG, it was statistically significant for D-dimer only. None of the participants developed any complications nor were any significant ADR/AE observed in the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19, AYUSH-64, as add-on to standard conventional care, contributed to improved clinical recovery and demonstrated potential in reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and TNF-α. Further, both the groups demonstrated comparable efficacy regarding negative RT-PCR for COVID-19.

摘要

背景

关于阿育吠陀干预措施作为2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)标准常规护理补充疗法的疗效和安全性的证据有限。

目的

本研究旨在探讨阿育吠陀64(AYUSH-64)作为常规护理补充疗法在改善无症状和轻症COVID-19病例临床康复及逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)阴性转化率方面的潜力。

材料与方法

在印度马哈拉施特拉邦那格浦尔政府医学院进行了一项开放标签随机对照研究,样本量为60名参与者。在本研究中,无症状或轻症COVID-19患者按1:1比例随机分为干预组和对照组(CG)。干预组(IG)在接受标准护理的同时,每天三次,饭后用水服用两粒阿育吠陀64胶囊(每粒500毫克),持续30天,而对照组仅接受标准护理。主要结局是在第7、15、22和30天COVID-19 RT-PCR检测转为阴性的参与者比例。次要结局是在第7、15、22和30天实现临床康复的参与者比例、第30天实验室参数的变化以及药物不良反应/不良事件的发生率。组内数据采用配对样本t检验/威尔科克森符号秩检验进行比较,组间数据采用独立样本t检验/曼-惠特尼检验进行比较。

结果

在每次随访中,RT-PCR检测转为阴性的参与者比例未观察到统计学显著差异(P = 0.134),两组疗效相当。在有症状的参与者中,干预组和对照组在第15天症状完全缓解的临床康复率分别为60%和37%(P = 0.098),在第30天分别为100%和85.2%(P = 0.112)。干预组中白细胞介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和D-二聚体等炎症标志物的改善具有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而对照组仅D-二聚体有统计学意义。两组均未出现任何并发症,也未观察到任何显著的药物不良反应/不良事件。

结论

在无症状和轻症COVID-19患者中,阿育吠陀64作为标准常规护理的补充疗法,有助于改善临床康复,并在降低IL-6和TNF-α等促炎标志物水平方面显示出潜力。此外,两组在COVID-19 RT-PCR阴性方面疗效相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c13/8614205/57da8315a062/AYU-41-107-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验