• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过研究过程整合实践:新冠疫情期间美国老年人的照料者

Integrating Praxis Through the Research Process: Caregivers for Older Americans During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Freidus Andrea, Shenk Dena, Wolf Christin

机构信息

UNC Charlotte-Anthropology.

出版信息

Ann Anthropol Pract. 2021 Nov;45(2):162-174. doi: 10.1111/napa.12166. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1111/napa.12166
PMID:34909243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8662160/
Abstract

While applied anthropological research is sometimes envisioned as a linear process, we present an alternative view based on our research with frontline workers providing long-term care (LTC) for older adults during COVID-19. We completed a rapid qualitative assessment in central North Carolina from May to November 2020. We conducted data analysis as we continued to collect data and implemented activities and interventions along the way. We report emerging findings that included the deleterious effects of isolation on older adults in both congregate and community-based LTC, the value of creatively using technology as an avenue for communication and engagement, the importance of leadership and flexibility, as well as an abundance of mental health struggles LTC workers faced in caring for older adults during COVID-19. We present how we were able to address these in a variety of ways during the inductive research process because of iterative analysis that occurred alongside continued data collection.

摘要

虽然应用人类学研究有时被设想为一个线性过程,但我们基于我们在新冠疫情期间对为老年人提供长期护理(LTC)的一线工作者的研究,提出了一种不同的观点。我们于2020年5月至11月在北卡罗来纳州中部完成了一项快速定性评估。我们在继续收集数据的过程中进行数据分析,并在此过程中实施活动和干预措施。我们报告了新出现的研究结果,包括隔离对机构养老和社区养老环境中老年人的有害影响、创造性地利用技术作为沟通和互动途径的价值、领导力和灵活性的重要性,以及长期护理工作者在新冠疫情期间照顾老年人时面临的大量心理健康问题。我们展示了在归纳研究过程中,由于持续数据收集过程中进行的迭代分析,我们如何能够以多种方式解决这些问题。

相似文献

1
Integrating Praxis Through the Research Process: Caregivers for Older Americans During the COVID-19 Pandemic.通过研究过程整合实践:新冠疫情期间美国老年人的照料者
Ann Anthropol Pract. 2021 Nov;45(2):162-174. doi: 10.1111/napa.12166. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
A cross-sectional survey assessing the preparedness of the long-term care sector to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.一项横断面调查评估了加拿大安大略省长期护理部门应对 COVID-19 大流行的准备情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01828-w.
4
Partnership between Primary Health and Social Care Services in the Long-Term Care of Older People with Dementia: A Vignette Study.初级卫生保健与社会保健服务在老年痴呆症患者长期护理中的伙伴关系:案例研究。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211011933. doi: 10.1177/00469580211011933.
5
Rapid Design and Delivery of an Experience-Based Co-designed Mobile App to Support the Mental Health Needs of Health Care Workers Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact Evaluation Protocol.快速设计并交付一款基于体验的共同设计移动应用程序,以满足受 COVID-19 大流行影响的医护人员的心理健康需求:影响评估方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Mar 9;10(3):e26168. doi: 10.2196/26168.
6
Exploring the challenges faced by frontline workers in health and social care amid the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of frontline workers in the English Midlands region, UK.探索英国英格兰中部地区卫生和社会保健一线工作者在 COVID-19 大流行期间面临的挑战:一线工作者的经历。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):655-661. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1792425. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
Peer-to-Peer Health Communication in Older Adults' Online Communities: Protocol for a Qualitative Netnographic Study and Co-Design Approach.老年人在线社区中的对等健康交流:定性网络民族志研究与协同设计方法方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):e19834. doi: 10.2196/19834.
8
Informal Caregivers' Perspectives on the Mandated No Visitation Policy During COVID-19 Pandemic in Long-Term Care: A Qualitative Study.长期护理中 COVID-19 大流行期间强制性无探视政策下非正式照护者的观点:一项定性研究。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Dec;47(12):19-26. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20211109-05. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
Interactive Television as a Medium to Reduce Social Isolation in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.互动电视作为一种媒介,可减少 COVID-19 大流行期间老年人的社会隔离。
R I Med J (2013). 2021 Aug 2;104(6):55-59.
10
How to lead health care workers during unprecedented crises: A qualitative study of the COVID-19 pandemic in Connecticut, USA.在前所未有的危机中如何领导医护人员:美国康涅狄格州 COVID-19 大流行的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 14;16(9):e0257423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257423. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology use in long-term care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study of paid employees' experiences in Western Canada.COVID-19大流行期间长期护理中的技术使用:对加拿大西部带薪员工经历的定性研究
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 19;10:20552076241303195. doi: 10.1177/20552076241303195. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Why Gerontology Needs Anthropology: Toward an Applied Anthropological Gerontology.老年学为何需要人类学:迈向应用人类学老年学
Soc Sci (Basel). 2024 Jan;13(1). doi: 10.3390/socsci13010004. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Introduction: Journaling and Mental Health during COVID-19: Insights from the Pandemic Journaling Project.引言:新冠疫情期间的日记记录与心理健康:来自大流行日记记录项目的见解
SSM Ment Health. 2022 Dec;2:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100141. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions and experiences of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.英国医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的看法和经历。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e040503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040503.
2
Carrying Out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons From COVID-19.在大流行期间开展快速定性研究:COVID-19 带来的新经验。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2192-2204. doi: 10.1177/1049732320951526. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in healthcare organisation and delivery.快速而粗略?快速民族志在医疗保健组织和提供中的应用的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):321-330. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007226. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
4
Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature.复杂健康突发事件中的快速定性研究方法:文献系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
5
Women's experience of being interviewed about abuse: a qualitative systematic review.女性在接受关于虐待问题访谈时的经历:一项定性系统综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;23(9-10):605-613. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12353.
6
The Utilization of Robotic Pets in Dementia Care.机器人宠物在痴呆症护理中的应用。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;55(2):569-574. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160703.
7
Community-centered responses to Ebola in urban Liberia: the view from below.利比里亚城市地区以社区为中心应对埃博拉疫情:底层视角
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 9;9(4):e0003706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003706. eCollection 2015 Apr.
8
Resident outcomes of person-centered care in long-term care: a narrative review of interventional research.长期护理中以患者为中心的护理对住院医生的影响:干预性研究的叙述性综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Oct;51(10):1395-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
9
Person-centered care for nursing home residents: the culture-change movement.以人为主的养老院居民照护:文化变革运动。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Feb;29(2):312-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0966. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
10
The nursing home culture-change movement: recent past, present, and future directions for research.养老院文化变革运动:研究的近期、现状及未来方向
Gerontologist. 2008 Apr;48(2):142-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.2.142.