University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2192-2204. doi: 10.1177/1049732320951526. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Social scientists have a robust history of contributing to better understandings of and responses to disease outbreaks. The implementation of qualitative research in the context of infectious epidemics, however, continues to lag behind in the delivery, credibility, and timeliness of findings when compared with other research designs. The purpose of this article is to reflect on our experience of carrying out three research studies (a rapid appraisal, a qualitative study based on interviews, and a mixed-methods survey) aimed at exploring health care delivery in the context of COVID-19. We highlight the importance of qualitative data to inform evidence-based public health responses and provide a way forward to global research teams who wish to implement similar rapid qualitative studies. We reflect on the challenges of setting up research teams, obtaining ethical approval, collecting and analyzing data in real-time and sharing actionable findings.
社会科学家在帮助人们更好地理解和应对疾病爆发方面有着丰富的经验。然而,与其他研究设计相比,在传染病的背景下实施定性研究,在研究结果的可交付性、可信度和及时性方面仍然滞后。本文旨在反思我们在开展三项研究(快速评估、基于访谈的定性研究和混合方法调查)方面的经验,这些研究旨在探索 COVID-19 背景下的医疗保健提供情况。我们强调了定性数据对于为基于证据的公共卫生应对措施提供信息的重要性,并为希望实施类似快速定性研究的全球研究团队提供了前进的道路。我们反思了组建研究团队、获得伦理批准、实时收集和分析数据以及分享可操作的研究结果方面所面临的挑战。