Suppr超能文献

与安慰剂相比,大麻类药物治疗慢性神经性疼痛的疗效:一项荟萃分析的系统评价

Efficacy of cannabis-based medications compared to placebo for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sainsbury Bradley, Bloxham Jared, Pour Masoumeh Hassan, Padilla Mariela, Enciso Reyes

机构信息

Master of Science Program in Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Clinical Dentistry, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Dec;21(6):479-506. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.6.479. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic neuropathic pain (NP) presents therapeutic challenges. Interest in the use of cannabis-based medications has outpaced the knowledge of its efficacy and safety in treating NP. The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of cannabis-based medications in individuals with chronic NP.

METHODS

Randomized placebo-controlled trials using tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidivarin (CBDV), or synthetic cannabinoids for NP treatment were included. The MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were examined. The primary outcome was the NP intensity. The risk of bias analysis was based on the Cochrane handbook.

RESULTS

The search of databases up to 2/1/2021 yielded 379 records with 17 RCTs included (861 patients with NP). Meta-analysis showed that there was a significant reduction in pain intensity for THC/CBD by -6.624 units (P < .001), THC by -8.681 units (P < .001), and dronabinol by -6.0 units (P = .008) compared to placebo on a 0-100 scale. CBD, CBDV, and CT-3 showed no significant differences. Patients taking THC/CBD were 1.756 times more likely to achieve a 30% reduction in pain (P = .008) and 1.422 times more likely to achieve a 50% reduction (P = .37) than placebo. Patients receiving THC had a 21% higher improvement in pain intensity (P = .005) and were 1.855 times more likely to achieve a 30% reduction in pain than placebo (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although THC and THC/CBD interventions provided a significant improvement in pain intensity and were more likely to provide a 30% reduction in pain, the evidence was of moderate-to-low quality. Further research is needed for CBD, dronabinol, CT-3, and CBDV.

摘要

背景

慢性神经性疼痛(NP)带来了治疗挑战。对基于大麻的药物的使用兴趣超过了对其治疗NP的疗效和安全性的了解。本综述的目的是评估基于大麻的药物对慢性NP患者的有效性。

方法

纳入使用四氢大麻酚(THC)、大麻二酚(CBD)、大麻二萜酚(CBDV)或合成大麻素治疗NP的随机安慰剂对照试验。检索了MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE和科学引文索引数据库。主要结局是NP强度。偏倚风险分析基于Cochrane手册。

结果

截至2021年1月2日对数据库的检索产生了379条记录,其中包括17项随机对照试验(861例NP患者)。荟萃分析表明,在0至100的量表上,与安慰剂相比,THC/CBD使疼痛强度显著降低了6.624个单位(P <.001),THC降低了8.681个单位(P <.001),屈大麻酚降低了6.0个单位(P =.008)。CBD、CBDV和CT-3无显著差异。服用THC/CBD的患者疼痛减轻30%的可能性比安慰剂高1.756倍(P =.008),疼痛减轻50%的可能性比安慰剂高1.422倍(P =.37)。接受THC治疗的患者疼痛强度改善率高21%(P =.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8e/8637910/269591718f40/jdapm-21-479-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验