McPartland John M
Department of Molecular Biology, GW Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018 Oct 1;3(1):203-212. doi: 10.1089/can.2018.0039. eCollection 2018.
New concepts are reviewed in systematics, including phylogenetics and nomenclature. The family now includes , , and eight genera formerly in the . Grouping , , and actually goes back 250 years. Print fossil of the extinct genus (=) reveals that lost a sibling perhaps 20 million years ago (mya). print fossils are rare (=3 worldwide), making it difficult to determine when and where she evolved. A molecular clock analysis with chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) suggests and diverged 27.8 mya. Microfossil (fossil pollen) data point to a center of origin in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Fossil pollen indicates that dispersed to Europe by 1.8-1.2 mya. Mapping pollen distribution over time suggests that European went through repeated genetic bottlenecks, when the population shrank during range contractions. Genetic drift in this population likely initiated allopatric differences between European (cannabidiol [CBD]>Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) and Asian (THC>CBD). DNA barcode analysis supports the separation of these taxa at a subspecies level, and recognizing the formal nomenclature of subsp. and subsp. . Herbarium specimens reveal that field botanists during the 18th-20th centuries applied these names to their collections rather capriciously. This may have skewed taxonomic determinations by Vavilov and Schultes, ultimately giving rise to today's vernacular taxonomy of "Sativa" and "Indica," which totally misaligns with formal and . Ubiquitous interbreeding and hybridization of "Sativa" and "Indica" has rendered their distinctions almost meaningless.
本文综述了系统分类学中的新概念,包括系统发育学和命名法。该科现在包括[具体物种1]、[具体物种2],以及以前属于[另一分类单元]的八个属。将[具体物种1]、[具体物种2]和[具体物种3]归为一组实际上可以追溯到250年前。已灭绝属[属名1](= [同义属名])的印痕化石表明,[属名1]可能在2000万年前失去了一个姊妹类群。[属名1]的印痕化石非常罕见(全球仅3处),这使得很难确定其进化的时间和地点。对叶绿体DNA(cpDNA)进行的分子钟分析表明,[具体物种1]和[具体物种2]在2780万年前分化。微化石(化石花粉)数据指向青藏高原东北部的一个起源中心。化石花粉表明,[具体物种1]在180万至120万年前扩散到了欧洲。绘制花粉随时间的分布图表明,欧洲的[具体物种1]经历了多次遗传瓶颈,即在分布范围收缩期间种群数量减少。该种群的遗传漂变可能引发了欧洲[具体物种1](大麻二酚[CBD]>Δ-四氢大麻酚[THC])和亚洲[具体物种1](THC>CBD)之间的异域差异。DNA条形码分析支持在亚种水平上区分这些分类群,并认可[具体物种1]亚种[亚种名1]和[具体物种1]亚种[亚种名2]的正式命名法。植物标本馆的标本显示,18至20世纪的野外植物学家在采集标本时相当随意地使用了这些名称。这可能影响了瓦维洛夫和舒尔茨的分类学判定,最终导致了如今“大麻”和“印度大麻”的通俗分类法,这与正式的分类法和命名法完全不符。“大麻”和“印度大麻”无处不在的杂交使得它们之间的区别几乎毫无意义。