• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于检测子宫内膜癌突变和分子分类的液滴数字 PCR 检测的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(2):e15. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e15. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e15
PMID:34910396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8899877/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) method for detecting mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and guiding its molecular classification.

METHODS

We reviewed 240 EC specimens from our hospital database. A ddPCR assay was used to identify mutations at 5 known hotspots (P286R, S297F, V411L, A456P, and S459F). Expressions of p53 and mismatch repair proteins were identified using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The ddPCR assay identified mutations in 10.8% of patients. The most common mutation was V411L (61.54%), followed by P286R (23.07%), S459F (7.69%), S297F (3.85%), and A456P (3.85%). Eight/one cases had positive ddPCR but negative Sanger sequencing/next-generation sequencing, respectively. Molecular classification revealed -mutated subtype as significantly more common for tumors with a high International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, advanced stage, and high/advanced risk groups; the mutated group was more frequent in the low stage and low/intermediate risk group. Survival analyses revealed the poorest outcomes for -mutated EC, while mismatch repair-deficient and no specific molecular profile ECs had similar progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes, and -mutated ECs had the best PFS outcome (p<0.001). When only intermediate, high-intermediate, and high-risk groups were analyzed for subgroups, molecular classification still showed differences both in PFS (p=0.003) and overall survival (p=0.017).

CONCLUSION

Hotspot mutations can be detected using the ddPCR assay. We suggest simultaneously evaluating mutation status using ddPCR and p53/mismatch repair protein expressions using immunohistochemistry, which can rapidly and accurately determine the molecular subtype of EC.

摘要

目的

评估液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)方法检测子宫内膜癌(EC)突变并指导其分子分类。

方法

我们回顾了我院数据库中 240 例 EC 标本。使用 ddPCR 检测鉴定 5 个已知热点(P286R、S297F、V411L、A456P 和 S459F)的突变。使用免疫组织化学法鉴定 p53 和错配修复蛋白的表达。

结果

ddPCR 检测鉴定出 10.8%的患者存在突变。最常见的突变是 V411L(61.54%),其次是 P286R(23.07%)、S459F(7.69%)、S297F(3.85%)和 A456P(3.85%)。分别有 8/1 例的 ddPCR 阳性而 Sanger 测序/下一代测序阴性。分子分类显示 -突变亚型在国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分级高、肌层浸润深、脉管侵犯、晚期和高危/高级别组的肿瘤中更为常见;而 突变组在低分期和低/中危组中更为常见。生存分析显示 -突变 EC 的预后最差,而错配修复缺陷和无特定分子谱 EC 的无进展生存期(PFS)相似,而 -突变 EC 的 PFS 最佳(p<0.001)。当仅对中危、中高危和高危组进行亚组分析时,分子分类在 PFS(p=0.003)和总生存期(p=0.017)方面仍存在差异。

结论

ddPCR 检测可检测热点突变。我们建议同时使用 ddPCR 评估 突变状态,并使用免疫组织化学法评估 p53/错配修复蛋白表达,这可以快速准确地确定 EC 的分子亚型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab1/8899877/be54dd0ee722/jgo-33-e15-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab1/8899877/4dc24871fcf2/jgo-33-e15-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab1/8899877/be54dd0ee722/jgo-33-e15-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab1/8899877/4dc24871fcf2/jgo-33-e15-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab1/8899877/be54dd0ee722/jgo-33-e15-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting mutations and molecular classification of endometrial cancer.一种用于检测子宫内膜癌突变和分子分类的液滴数字 PCR 检测的临床评估。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(2):e15. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e15. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Enhanced Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Integrating through Droplet Digital PCR and L1CAM.早期子宫内膜癌的强化风险分层:通过液滴数字PCR和L1CAM进行整合
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;15(19):4899. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194899.
3
Analysis of 108 patients with endometrial carcinoma using the PROMISE classification and additional genetic analyses for MMR-D.采用 PROMISE 分类和额外的 MMR-D 基因分析对 108 例子宫内膜癌患者进行分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Identification of mutated group using a molecular and immunohistochemical classification of endometrial carcinoma to improve prognostic evaluation for adjuvant treatments.采用分子和免疫组织化学分类的方法鉴定突变组,以改善子宫内膜癌辅助治疗的预后评估。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):640-647. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000871. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
POLE mutation combined with microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern invasion in endometrial carcinomas might be associated with poor survival in Chinese women.POLE 基因突变合并子宫内膜癌的微囊状、长形和碎片状(MELF)浸润模式可能与中国女性的不良生存相关。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.102. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
The clinicopathology and survival characteristics of patients with POLE proofreading mutations in endometrial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.POLE 校对基因突变型子宫内膜癌的临床病理特征和生存特点:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263585. eCollection 2022.
7
Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer.ProMisE验证:一种简单的、基于基因组学的子宫内膜癌临床分类器。
Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;123(5):802-813. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30496. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups.子宫内膜癌 3 级的分子分类确定了不同的预后亚组。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 May;42(5):561-568. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001020.
9
The clinicopathological characteristics of POLE-mutated/ultramutated endometrial carcinoma and prognostic value of POLE status: a meta-analysis based on 49 articles incorporating 12,120 patients.POLE 突变/超高突变型子宫内膜癌的临床病理特征及 POLE 状态的预后价值:基于 49 篇文献纳入 12120 例患者的荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 10;22(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10267-2.
10
Clinical features of ProMisE groups identify different phenotypes of patients with endometrial cancer.ProMisE 分组的临床特征可识别出子宫内膜癌患者的不同表型。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;303(6):1393-1400. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06028-4. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic implication of polymerase epsilon-mutated endometrial cancer.聚合酶ε突变型子宫内膜癌的预后意义。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024 Sep 17;37(2):135-144. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_120_24. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Mismatch repair, p53, and L1 cell adhesion molecule status influence the response to chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer.错配修复、p53和L1细胞黏附分子状态影响晚期和复发性子宫内膜癌对化疗的反应。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1586. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13294-3.
3
New clinicopathological concept of endometrial carcinoma with integration of histological features and molecular profiles.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Predictive Power of a Combination versus Individual Biomarker Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中,联合生物标志物检测与单个生物标志物检测预测能力的比较。
Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Apr;54(2):424-433. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.583. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
2
Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy.PORTEC-3 试验高危子宫内膜癌的分子分类:对预后的影响和辅助治疗的获益。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3388-3397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00549. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
3
子宫内膜癌的新临床病理概念:组织学特征与分子谱的整合。
Pathol Int. 2024 Oct;74(10):557-573. doi: 10.1111/pin.13471. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and Its Impact on Therapy Selection.子宫内膜癌的分子分类及其对治疗选择的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 28;25(11):5893. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115893.
5
Enrichment for the mutated against wild subtype using clinicopathologic factors and cyclin B1 immunohistochemistry in endometrial cancer.利用临床病理因素和细胞周期蛋白B1免疫组化对子宫内膜癌中突变型与野生型亚型进行富集分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May;35(3):e94. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e94.
6
The new 2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: what is different from the previous 2009 FIGO staging system?新版 2023FIGO 子宫内膜癌分期系统:与旧版 2009FIGO 分期系统有何不同?
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;35(5):e59. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e59. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.前哨淋巴结绘图在子宫内膜癌中的应用。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jan;35(1):e29. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e29. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
8
Molecular-based classification of endometrial carcinoma in Northern Thailand: impact on prognosis and potential for implementation in resource-limited settings.泰国北部基于分子的子宫内膜癌分类:对预后的影响和在资源有限环境中的应用潜力。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02677-6.
9
A simplified two-marker immunohistochemistry strategy for Lynch syndrome screening in endometrial cancer patients.一种用于子宫内膜癌患者林奇综合征筛查的简化双标记免疫组化策略。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):537-544. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23124. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Enhanced Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Integrating through Droplet Digital PCR and L1CAM.早期子宫内膜癌的强化风险分层:通过液滴数字PCR和L1CAM进行整合
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;15(19):4899. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194899.
Estrogen receptor α as a predictive biomarker for survival in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
雌激素受体α作为人乳头瘤病毒阳性口咽鳞状细胞癌生存的预测生物标志物。
J Transl Med. 2020 Jun 16;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02396-8.
4
Identification of a Gene Panel for Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: a Possible Prognostic Value?鉴定子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌的基因面板:是否具有预后价值?
Reprod Sci. 2020 Feb;27(2):592-598. doi: 10.1007/s43032-019-00059-8. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Independent prognostic value of ultra-sensitive quantification of tumor pre-treatment T790M subclones in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by first/second generation TKI, depends on variant allele frequency (VAF): Results of the French cooperative thoracic intergroup (IFCT) biomarkers France project.超敏检测 EGFR 突变型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者肿瘤治疗前 T790M 亚克隆对第一代/二代 TKI 治疗的独立预后价值取决于变异等位基因频率(VAF):法国胸科协作组(IFCT)生物标志物 France 项目的研究结果。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Feb;140:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of 'multiple-classifier' endometrial carcinomas.“多分类器”子宫内膜癌的临床病理和分子特征。
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):312-322. doi: 10.1002/path.5373. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
8
Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌中体 POLE 突变的解读。
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):323-335. doi: 10.1002/path.5372. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
Prognostic classification of endometrial cancer using a molecular approach based on a twelve-gene NGS panel.采用基于十二基因 NGS -panel 的分子方法对子宫内膜癌进行预后分类。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 2;9(1):18093. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54624-x.
10
Clinical outcomes of patients with POLE mutated endometrioid endometrial cancer.POLE 突变型子宫内膜样癌患者的临床结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.028. Epub 2019 Nov 19.