Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3388-3397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00549. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
The randomized Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Women With High-Risk Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC-3) trial investigated the benefit of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CTRT) versus radiotherapy alone (RT) for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). Because The Cancer Genome Atlas defined an EC molecular classification with strong prognostic value, we investigated prognosis and impact of chemotherapy for each molecular subgroup using tissue samples from PORTEC-3 trial participants.
Paraffin-embedded tissues of 423 consenting patients were collected. Immunohistochemistry for p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and DNA sequencing for exonuclease domain were done to classify tumors as p53 abnormal (p53abn), ultramutated (mut), MMR-deficient (MMRd), or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox model were used for analysis.
Molecular analysis was successful in 410 high-risk EC (97%), identifying the 4 subgroups: p53abn EC (n = 93; 23%), mut (n = 51; 12%), MMRd (n = 137; 33%), and NSMP (n = 129; 32%). Five-year RFS was 48% for patients with p53abn EC, 98% for mut EC, 72% for MMRd EC, and 74% for NSMP EC ( < .001). The 5-year RFS with CTRT versus RT for p53abn EC was 59% versus 36% ( = .019); 100% versus 97% for patients with mut EC ( = .637); 68% versus 76% ( = .428) for MMRd EC; and 80% versus 68% ( = .243) for NSMP EC.
Molecular classification has strong prognostic value in high-risk EC, with significantly improved RFS with adjuvant CTRT for p53abn tumors, regardless of histologic type. Patients with mut EC had an excellent RFS in both trial arms. EC molecular classification should be incorporated in the risk stratification of these patients as well as in future trials to target specific subgroups of patients.
随机辅助放化疗与单纯放疗在高危子宫内膜癌患者中的比较(PORTEC-3)试验研究了联合辅助化疗和放疗(CTRT)与单纯放疗(RT)对高危子宫内膜癌(EC)患者的益处。由于癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genome Atlas)定义了具有强预后价值的 EC 分子分类,我们使用 PORTEC-3 试验参与者的组织样本,研究了每个分子亚组的预后和化疗的影响。
收集 423 名同意参与的患者的石蜡包埋组织。进行 p53 和错配修复(MMR)蛋白的免疫组化染色,以及外切酶结构域的 DNA 测序,以将肿瘤分类为 p53 异常(p53abn)、超突变(mut)、MMR 缺陷(MMRd)或无特定分子谱(NSMP)。主要终点是无复发生存(RFS)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法、对数秩检验和 Cox 模型进行分析。
对 410 例高危 EC(97%)进行了分子分析,确定了 4 个亚组:p53abn EC(n = 93;23%)、mut(n = 51;12%)、MMRd(n = 137;33%)和 NSMP(n = 129;32%)。p53abn EC 患者的 5 年 RFS 为 48%,mut EC 为 98%,MMRd EC 为 72%,NSMP EC 为 74%(<0.001)。与 RT 相比,p53abn EC 患者接受 CTRT 的 5 年 RFS 为 59%比 36%(=0.019);mut EC 患者为 100%比 97%(=0.637);MMRd EC 为 68%比 76%(=0.428);NSMP EC 为 80%比 68%(=0.243)。
分子分类在高危 EC 中具有很强的预后价值,与单纯放疗相比,p53abn 肿瘤的辅助 CTRT 可显著提高无复发生存率。在两个试验组中,mut EC 患者的 RFS 均非常好。EC 分子分类应纳入这些患者的风险分层,以及未来的试验中,以针对特定的患者亚组。