Suppr超能文献

探究大学阶段计算机化考试焦虑与其他变量之间的关系:以沙特阿拉伯健康专业大学生为例。

Investigating the relationship of computerized examination anxiety with other variables at the university level: A case of health college students in Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Rasheed Abeer

机构信息

Self-Development Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Oct 29;10:371. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_220_21. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the daily lives of people, the level of anxiety plays a significant role. This applies to students, who experience anxiety when taking examinations referred to as examination anxiety. Majority of the current educational institutions have shifted from a traditional evaluation system to one that is computerized. The present study aim is to identify the computerized examination anxiety (CEA) among college students in the Faculty of Health and to compare the differences among them based on study system and gender.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The research is a descriptive quantitative design. The research population consists of 138 health college students. CEA scale was used to identify the level of examination anxiety among students. Data were then exposed to analysis, namely the descriptive statistics, independent sample -test, and Chi-square tests, to obtain the answers to the research questions at the level of <0.05.

RESULTS

Based on the findings, the CEA experienced by the health students was of moderate level. The findings also showed insignificant differences between students' levels of anxiety based on gender and study system at <0.05 value.

CONCLUSION

The study contributed to literature by adding a study related to CEA during COVID-19. The study enumerated implications and recommendations based on the findings.

摘要

背景

在人们的日常生活中,焦虑水平起着重要作用。这适用于学生,他们在参加考试时会经历焦虑,即考试焦虑。当前大多数教育机构已从传统评估系统转向计算机化评估系统。本研究旨在确定健康学院大学生中的计算机化考试焦虑(CEA),并根据学习系统和性别比较他们之间的差异。

材料与方法

本研究为描述性定量设计。研究对象包括138名健康学院学生。使用CEA量表来确定学生的考试焦虑水平。然后对数据进行分析,即描述性统计、独立样本t检验和卡方检验,以在<0.05的水平上获得研究问题的答案。

结果

根据研究结果,健康专业学生经历的CEA处于中等水平。研究结果还表明,在<0.05的水平上,基于性别和学习系统的学生焦虑水平之间没有显著差异。

结论

该研究通过增加一项与COVID-19期间CEA相关的研究,为文献做出了贡献。该研究根据研究结果列举了相关影响和建议。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验