Suppr超能文献

2021 年无症状性颈动脉狭窄的最佳治疗管理:尚无定论。一项国际性、多学科、专家回顾和立场声明。

Optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in 2021: the jury is still out. An international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, Athens, Greece -

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London Medical School, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2022 Apr;41(2):158-169. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04825-2. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

Abstract

The recommendations of international guidelines for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) often vary considerably and extend from a conservative approach with risk factor modification and best medical treatment (BMT) alone, to a more aggressive approach with a carotid intervention plus BMT. The aim of the current multispecialty position statement was to reconcile the conflicting views on the topic. A literature review was performed with a focus on data from recent studies. Several clinical and imaging high-risk features have been identified that are associated with an increased long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk in patients with ACS. Such high-risk clinical/imaging features include intraplaque hemorrhage, impaired cerebrovascular reserve, carotid plaque echolucency/ulceration/ neovascularization, a lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin or ruptured fibrous cap, silent brain infarction, a contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke episode, male patients <75 years and microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler. There is growing evidence that 80-99% ACS indicate a higher stroke risk than 50-79% stenoses. Although aggressive risk factor control and BMT should be implemented in all ACS patients, several high-risk features that may increase the risk of a future cerebrovascular event are now documented. Consequently, some guidelines recommend a prophylactic carotid intervention in high-risk patients to prevent future cerebrovascular events. Until the results of the much-anticipated randomized controlled trials emerge, the jury is still out regarding the optimal management of ACS patients.

摘要

国际指南关于无症状性颈动脉狭窄(ACS)管理的建议常常存在较大差异,从仅进行危险因素修正和最佳药物治疗(BMT)的保守方法,到包括颈动脉介入治疗加 BMT 的更积极方法。本多学科立场声明的目的是调和关于这一主题的相互矛盾的观点。进行了文献复习,重点是最近研究的数据。已经确定了几个与 ACS 患者长期同侧缺血性卒中风险增加相关的临床和影像学高危特征。这些高危临床/影像学特征包括斑块内出血、脑血管储备功能受损、颈动脉斑块回声不均/溃疡/新生血管形成、富含脂质的坏死核心、薄纤维帽或破裂、无症状性脑梗死、对侧短暂性脑缺血发作/卒中发作、<75 岁的男性患者和经颅多普勒上的微栓子信号。越来越多的证据表明,80-99%的 ACS 比 50-79%的狭窄预示着更高的卒中风险。虽然所有 ACS 患者都应实施积极的危险因素控制和 BMT,但现在已经记录了一些可能增加未来脑血管事件风险的高危特征。因此,一些指南建议对高危患者进行预防性颈动脉介入治疗,以预防未来的脑血管事件。在备受期待的随机对照试验结果出现之前,ACS 患者的最佳管理仍存在争议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验