• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2021 年无症状性颈动脉狭窄的最佳治疗管理:尚无定论。一项国际性、多学科、专家回顾和立场声明。

Optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in 2021: the jury is still out. An international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, Athens, Greece -

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London Medical School, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2022 Apr;41(2):158-169. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04825-2. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04825-2
PMID:34913633
Abstract

The recommendations of international guidelines for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) often vary considerably and extend from a conservative approach with risk factor modification and best medical treatment (BMT) alone, to a more aggressive approach with a carotid intervention plus BMT. The aim of the current multispecialty position statement was to reconcile the conflicting views on the topic. A literature review was performed with a focus on data from recent studies. Several clinical and imaging high-risk features have been identified that are associated with an increased long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk in patients with ACS. Such high-risk clinical/imaging features include intraplaque hemorrhage, impaired cerebrovascular reserve, carotid plaque echolucency/ulceration/ neovascularization, a lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin or ruptured fibrous cap, silent brain infarction, a contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke episode, male patients <75 years and microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler. There is growing evidence that 80-99% ACS indicate a higher stroke risk than 50-79% stenoses. Although aggressive risk factor control and BMT should be implemented in all ACS patients, several high-risk features that may increase the risk of a future cerebrovascular event are now documented. Consequently, some guidelines recommend a prophylactic carotid intervention in high-risk patients to prevent future cerebrovascular events. Until the results of the much-anticipated randomized controlled trials emerge, the jury is still out regarding the optimal management of ACS patients.

摘要

国际指南关于无症状性颈动脉狭窄(ACS)管理的建议常常存在较大差异,从仅进行危险因素修正和最佳药物治疗(BMT)的保守方法,到包括颈动脉介入治疗加 BMT 的更积极方法。本多学科立场声明的目的是调和关于这一主题的相互矛盾的观点。进行了文献复习,重点是最近研究的数据。已经确定了几个与 ACS 患者长期同侧缺血性卒中风险增加相关的临床和影像学高危特征。这些高危临床/影像学特征包括斑块内出血、脑血管储备功能受损、颈动脉斑块回声不均/溃疡/新生血管形成、富含脂质的坏死核心、薄纤维帽或破裂、无症状性脑梗死、对侧短暂性脑缺血发作/卒中发作、<75 岁的男性患者和经颅多普勒上的微栓子信号。越来越多的证据表明,80-99%的 ACS 比 50-79%的狭窄预示着更高的卒中风险。虽然所有 ACS 患者都应实施积极的危险因素控制和 BMT,但现在已经记录了一些可能增加未来脑血管事件风险的高危特征。因此,一些指南建议对高危患者进行预防性颈动脉介入治疗,以预防未来的脑血管事件。在备受期待的随机对照试验结果出现之前,ACS 患者的最佳管理仍存在争议。

相似文献

1
Optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in 2021: the jury is still out. An international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement.2021 年无症状性颈动脉狭窄的最佳治疗管理:尚无定论。一项国际性、多学科、专家回顾和立场声明。
Int Angiol. 2022 Apr;41(2):158-169. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04825-2. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
2
Optimal Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis in 2021: The Jury is Still Out. An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement.2021 年无症状颈动脉狭窄的最佳管理:尚无定论。国际多学科专家评论和立场声明。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jan;31(1):106182. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106182. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
3
Plaque characteristics of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke.无症状颈动脉狭窄斑块特征与卒中风险。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(5-6):343-50. doi: 10.1159/000343227. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
4
Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.当代颈动脉成像:从狭窄程度到斑块易损性
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):27-42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
Identifying asymptomatic patients at high-risk for stroke.识别中风高危无症状患者。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Jun;60(3):332-344. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10912-3. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
Association of Progression of Carotid Artery Wall Volume and Recurrent Transient Ischemic Attack or Stroke: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.颈动脉壁体积进展与复发性短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中的相关性:一项磁共振成像研究。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):614-620. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019422. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
7
Contralateral Stenosis and Echolucent Plaque Morphology are Associated with Elevated Stroke Risk in Patients Treated with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis within a Controlled Clinical Trial (SPACE-2).在一项对照临床试验(SPACE-2)中,接受无症状颈动脉狭窄治疗的患者,对侧狭窄和回声不均匀斑块形态与升高的卒中风险相关。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105940. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105940. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
8
Medical therapy does not confer stroke prevention for all patients: identification of high-risk patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is still needed.药物治疗并不能为所有患者预防中风:仍需要识别无症状性颈动脉狭窄的高危患者。
Int Angiol. 2019 Oct;38(5):372-380. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04143-9. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉斑块 MRI 与卒中风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3071-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002551. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
10
Prevalence of High-risk Plaques and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Meta-analysis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者高危斑块的患病率和卒中风险:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Dec 1;77(12):1524-1535. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2658.