• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prevalence of High-risk Plaques and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Meta-analysis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者高危斑块的患病率和卒中风险:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Dec 1;77(12):1524-1535. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2658.
2
Plaque characteristics of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke.无症状颈动脉狭窄斑块特征与卒中风险。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(5-6):343-50. doi: 10.1159/000343227. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
3
Prediction of Stroke Risk by Detection of Hemorrhage in Carotid Plaques: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.基于颈动脉斑块出血检测预测卒中风险:个体患者数据分析的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;13(2 Pt 1):395-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
4
Extracranial Carotid Plaque Calcification and Cerebrovascular Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颅外颈动脉斑块钙化与脑血管缺血:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2621-2628. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042807. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
5
Ultrasound Characteristics of Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.有症状颈动脉斑块的超声特征:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40(3-4):165-74. doi: 10.1159/000437339. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
6
Cerebral Ischemic Events Ipsilateral to Carotid Artery Stenosis. The Carotid Asymptomatic Stenosis (CARAS) Observational Study: First Year Preliminary Results.颈动脉狭窄同侧的脑缺血事件。颈动脉无症状性狭窄(CARAS)观察研究:第一年初步结果。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Aug;31(8):106574. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106574. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
The Risk of Stroke and TIA in Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非狭窄性颈动脉斑块患者发生卒中和 TIA 的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Aug;41(8):1453-1459. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6613. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄程度与卒中风险的关系:基于人群的队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Mar;20(3):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30484-1.
9
Plaque echolucency and stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄中斑块回声与卒中风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2015 Jan;46(1):91-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006091. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
10
Prevalence of Non-Stenotic (<50%) Carotid Plaques in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非狭窄性(<50%)颈动脉斑块在急性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作中的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Oct;29(10):105117. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105117. Epub 2020 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of matrix metalloproteinases and adhesive molecules with important aspects of carotid artery stenosis.基质金属蛋白酶和黏附分子与颈动脉狭窄重要方面的关联
J Med Biochem. 2025 Jun 13;44(3):553-560. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-51391.
2
Acute stroke risk prediction model based on dual-energy CTA-derived carotid plaque, perivascular adipose tissue characteristics, and serum lipid parameters: a dual-center study.基于双能CTA衍生的颈动脉斑块、血管周围脂肪组织特征和血脂参数的急性卒中风险预测模型:一项双中心研究。
Neuroradiology. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03723-w.
3
MRI ensemble model of plaque and perivascular adipose tissue as PET-equivalent for identifying carotid atherosclerotic inflammation.作为等同于PET用于识别颈动脉粥样硬化炎症的斑块和血管周围脂肪组织的MRI集成模型。
EJNMMI Res. 2025 Aug 6;15(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13550-025-01293-9.
4
Transfer learning with class activation maps in compositions driving plaque classification in carotid ultrasound.基于类激活映射的迁移学习在颈动脉超声斑块分类组合中的应用
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 9;7:1484231. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1484231. eCollection 2025.
5
Diagnostic value of ultrasound and shear wave elastography in carotid plaque risk stratification.超声及剪切波弹性成像在颈动脉斑块风险分层中的诊断价值
J Ultrasound. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s40477-025-01051-6.
6
Urgent/emergent carotid revascularization is associated with an increase in stroke and mortality.紧急/急诊颈动脉血运重建与中风和死亡率增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.07.005.
7
Echogenicity of carotid plaques as a predictor of regression following lipid-lowering therapy.颈动脉斑块的回声性作为降脂治疗后斑块消退的预测指标。
Thromb J. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00753-5.
8
The Effect of Lesion Length on Doppler Velocities Used Routinely to Determine Carotid Stenosis Cross-Sectional Severity.病变长度对常规用于确定颈动脉狭窄横截面严重程度的多普勒速度的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 15;15(10):1259. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101259.
9
Quantification of carotid artery plaque and peri-vascular adipose tissue attenuation on computed tomography.计算机断层扫描对颈动脉斑块及血管周围脂肪组织衰减的定量分析
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 Apr 8;3(1):qyaf040. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf040. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Carotid plaque characteristics by computed Tomography: A diagnostic accuracy systematic review.计算机断层扫描显示的颈动脉斑块特征:一项诊断准确性的系统评价
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 21;58:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101656. eCollection 2025 Jun.

无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者高危斑块的患病率和卒中风险:一项荟萃分析。

Prevalence of High-risk Plaques and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Royal Adelaide Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2020 Dec 1;77(12):1524-1535. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2658.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2658
PMID:32744595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400201/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is an ongoing debate regarding the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Previous studies have reported imaging features of high-risk plaques that could help to optimize the risk-benefit ratio of revascularization. However, such studies have not provided an accurate estimate of the prevalence of high-risk plaques and the associated annual incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events to inform the design of clinical trials using a risk-oriented selection of patients before randomization.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relevance and feasibility of risk-oriented selection of patients for revascularization.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of PubMed and Ovid Embase from database inception to July 31, 2019, was performed.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective observational studies that reported prevalence of high-risk plaques and incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Aggregated data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Data were analyzed from December 16, 2019, to January 15, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prevalence of high-risk plaques and annual incidence of ipsilateral ischemic events.

RESULTS

Overall, 64 studies enrolling 20 751 participants aged 29 to 95 years (mean age range, 55.0-76.5 years; proportion of men, 45%-87%) were included in the meta-analysis. Among all participants, the pooled prevalence of high-risk plaques was 26.5% (95% CI, 22.9%-30.3%). The most prevalent high-risk plaque features were neovascularization (43.4%; 95% CI, 31.4%-55.8%) in 785 participants, echolucency (42.3%; 95% CI, 32.2%-52.8%) in 12 364 participants, and lipid-rich necrotic core (36.3%; 95% CI, 27.7%-45.2%) in 3728 participants. The overall incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was 3.2 events per 100 person-years (22 cohorts with 10 381 participants; mean follow-up period, 2.8 years; range, 0.7-6.5 years). The incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was higher in patients with high-risk plaques (4.3 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 2.5-6.5 events per 100 person-years) than in those without high-risk plaques (1.2 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.6-1.8 events per 100 person-years), with an odds ratio of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.1-4.3; I2 = 48.8%). In studies focusing on severe stenosis (9 cohorts with 2128 participants; mean follow-up period, 2.8 years; range, 1.4-6.5 years), the incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was 3.7 events per 100 person-years (95% CI, 1.9-6.0 events per 100 person-years). The incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was also higher in patients with high-risk plaques (7.3 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 2.0-15.0 events per 100 person-years) than in those without high-risk plaques (1.7 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.6-3.3 events per 100 person-years), with an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CI, 1.7-5.9; I2 = 39.6%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

High-risk plaques are common in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, and the associated risk of an ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular event is higher than the currently accepted estimates. Extension of routine assessment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis beyond the grade of stenosis may help improve risk stratification and optimize therapy.

摘要

重要性

无症状性颈动脉狭窄的治疗策略一直存在争议。先前的研究报告了高危斑块的影像学特征,这有助于优化血运重建的风险获益比。然而,这些研究并未提供高危斑块的准确发生率和同侧缺血性脑血管事件的年发生率,从而无法为临床试验提供信息,无法根据风险选择患者进行随机分组。

目的

评估基于风险选择患者进行血运重建的相关性和可行性。

数据来源

从数据库建立到 2019 年 7 月 31 日,对 PubMed 和 Ovid Embase 进行了系统检索。

研究选择

纳入了报告高危斑块发生率和同侧缺血性脑血管事件发生率的前瞻性观察性研究。

数据提取和综合

使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总了汇总数据。数据分析于 2019 年 12 月 16 日至 2020 年 1 月 15 日进行。

主要结局和测量指标

高危斑块发生率和同侧缺血性事件的年发生率。

结果

共有 64 项研究纳入了 20751 名年龄 29 岁至 95 岁的参与者(平均年龄范围为 55.0 岁至 76.5 岁;男性比例为 45%至 87%),进行了荟萃分析。在所有参与者中,高危斑块的总发生率为 26.5%(95%CI,22.9%至 30.3%)。最常见的高危斑块特征为 785 名参与者的新生血管形成(43.4%;95%CI,31.4%至 55.8%),12364 名参与者的回声不透明(42.3%;95%CI,32.2%至 52.8%)和 3728 名参与者的富含脂质的坏死核心(36.3%;95%CI,27.7%至 45.2%)。同侧缺血性脑血管事件的总发生率为每 100 人年 3.2 例(22 项队列共 10381 名参与者;平均随访时间为 2.8 年;范围,0.7 年至 6.5 年)。在有高危斑块的患者中,同侧缺血性脑血管事件的发生率更高(每 100 人年 4.3 例;95%CI,2.5 例至 6.5 例),而无高危斑块的患者发生率较低(每 100 人年 1.2 例;95%CI,0.6 例至 1.8 例),比值比为 3.0(95%CI,2.1 例至 4.3 例;I2=48.8%)。在关注严重狭窄的研究中(9 项队列共 2128 名参与者;平均随访时间为 2.8 年;范围,1.4 年至 6.5 年),同侧缺血性脑血管事件的发生率为每 100 人年 3.7 例(95%CI,1.9 例至 6.0 例)。在有高危斑块的患者中,同侧缺血性脑血管事件的发生率也更高(每 100 人年 7.3 例;95%CI,2.0 例至 15.0 例),而无高危斑块的患者发生率较低(每 100 人年 1.7 例;95%CI,0.6 例至 3.3 例),比值比为 3.2(95%CI,1.7 例至 5.9 例;I2=39.6%)。

结论和相关性

无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的高危斑块很常见,同侧缺血性脑血管事件的风险高于目前公认的估计。在常规评估无症状性颈动脉狭窄时,除狭窄程度外,还应评估高危斑块,这有助于改善风险分层,优化治疗策略。