Suppr超能文献

无牙下颌骨中极短(4毫米)种植体的初期稳定性和二期稳定性:一项前瞻性临床试验的初步结果

Primary and Secondary Stability of Extrashort (4-mm) Implants in the Edentulous Mandible: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Sabatini Gabriela Panca, Lidani Rangel, Floriani Franciele, Oliveira dos Santos Tarla Thaynara, Philippi Analucia, Mezzomo Luis André

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Nov-Dec;36(6):1173-1179. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8437.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the primary and secondary stability of conventional (≥ 8-mm) and extrashort (4-mm) implants in edentulous patients using different methods of assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients underwent implant surgery and were randomly allocated into two groups: test, with two conventional implants in the anterior region and two extrashort (4-mm) implants in the posterior region; and control, with two conventional (≥ 8-mm) implants in the anterior region only. Primary stability (S1-implant placement) was assessed by insertion torque, implant stability quotient (ISQ, Osstell), and damping capacity (PTV, Periotest), while secondary stability (S2-21 days after S1; and S2-at prosthetic loading, ± 3 months after S1) was evaluated by ISQ and PTV. The statistical significance level was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Fifty conventional implants and 24 extrashort implants were placed in 25 patients. The overall survival rate was 97.3%. There was no statistically significant difference between the insertion torque of conventional and extrashort implants (P > .05). PTV values were significantly lower for conventional implants only at S2 (P = .041). ISQ values were significantly greater for conventional implants at S1 (P = .004), whereas at S2 and S2, no differences were found (P = .413 and P = .490, respectively). Damping capacity showed no significant differences between S1-S2M and S1-S2. ISQ values showed a significant increase of stability between S1-S2, for conventional (P = .022) and extrashort (P = .005) implants, which was different from that observed between S1-S2. There was a moderate negative correlation between the PTV and ISQ variables (r = 0.5) of extrashort implants, and between the PTV and insertion torque (r = -0.3) of conventional implants. For extrashort implants, there was a null correlation between ISQ and torque (r = 0.0). There was a moderately positive correlation between ISQ and torque (r = 0.3) in the conventional implant group.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that extrashort and conventional implants present similar primary and secondary stability values and may similarly influence restorative protocols.

摘要

目的

采用不同评估方法比较无牙患者中常规(≥8毫米)种植体和超短(4毫米)种植体的初期稳定性和二期稳定性。

材料与方法

患者接受种植手术,并随机分为两组:试验组,在前牙区植入两颗常规种植体,在后牙区植入两颗超短(4毫米)种植体;对照组,仅在前牙区植入两颗常规(≥8毫米)种植体。初期稳定性(S1——种植体植入时)通过植入扭矩、种植体稳定性商数(ISQ,Osstell)和阻尼能力(PTV,Periotest)进行评估,而二期稳定性(S2——S1后21天;以及S2——修复体加载时,S1后±3个月)通过ISQ和PTV进行评估。统计学显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。

结果

在25名患者中植入了50颗常规种植体和24颗超短种植体。总体存活率为97.3%。常规种植体和超短种植体的植入扭矩之间无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。仅在S2时,常规种植体的PTV值显著更低(P = 0. ,041)。在S1时,常规种植体的ISQ值显著更高(P = 0.004),而在S2和S2时,未发现差异(分别为P = 0.413和P = 0.490)。阻尼能力在S1 - S2M和S1 - S2之间未显示出显著差异。对于常规种植体和超短种植体,ISQ值在S1 - S2之间均显示出稳定性显著增加(常规种植体P = 0.022,超短种植体P = 0.005),这与在S1 - S2之间观察到的情况不同。超短种植体的PTV和ISQ变量之间存在中度负相关(r = 0.5),常规种植体的PTV和植入扭矩之间存在中度负相关(r = -0.3)。对于超短种植体,ISQ和扭矩之间无相关性(r = 0.0)。在常规种植体组中,ISQ和扭矩之间存在中度正相关(r = 0.3)。

结论

结果表明,超短种植体和常规种植体具有相似的初期和二期稳定性值,并且可能对修复方案产生类似的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验