Department of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Department of Electrophysiology, AIG Hospital, Hyderabad, Telengana, India.
J Electrocardiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;70:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by biventricular pacing (BiV) may worsen indices of ventricular repolarization. The impact of His bundle pacing (HBP) on repolarization is not well studied in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The aim of the study is to compare the repolarization parameters in ECG between these two pacing modalities.
Baseline and post implant parameters of 20 patients who had undergone HBP were compared with 18 patients who underwent CRT (BiV) implantation. Repolarization parameters were monitored before implantation, within 24 hours and after 6 weeks of implantation. Patients were followed up till 6 months with clinical and echocardiographic parameters.
Baseline clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were similar in both groups. Significant differences were noted in QT T and T/QT between HBP and CRT groups both on immediate post implant and after 6 weeks of implantation. Compared to pre-implantation,significant shortening of T and T/QT was observed immediately (90.54 ± 24.35 vs 69.62 ± 12.92, p < 0.05 and 0.20 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, p < 0.05) and after 6 weeks (90.54 ± 24.35 vs 66.08 ± 14.95, p < 0.05 and 0.20 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.02, p < 0.05) in HBP implant (group A). However, these changes were not present in CRT cohort (group B). During a follow up of 6 months, NYHA class and LV function between two groups remain comparable.
HBP is associated with significant reduction of T and T/QT compared to CRT. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether this improvement in indices of repolarization is associated with reduction in clinical arrhythmic events or not.
双心室起搏(BiV)的心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可能会使心室复极指数恶化。希氏束起搏(HBP)对左心室收缩功能障碍患者复极的影响尚未得到很好的研究。本研究旨在比较这两种起搏方式在心电图中的复极参数。
比较了 20 例接受 HBP 植入术的患者和 18 例接受 CRT(BiV)植入术的患者的基线和植入后参数。在植入前、植入后 24 小时和植入后 6 周监测复极参数。对患者进行了 6 个月的临床和超声心动图随访。
两组患者的基线临床、心电图和超声心动图参数相似。HBP 和 CRT 组在植入即刻和植入后 6 周时均观察到 QT T 和 T/QT 有显著差异。与植入前相比,HBP 组植入即刻(90.54±24.35 与 69.62±12.92,p<0.05 和 0.20±0.05 与 0.15±0.03,p<0.05)和植入后 6 周(90.54±24.35 与 66.08±14.95,p<0.05 和 0.20±0.05 与 0.15±0.02,p<0.05)T 和 T/QT 明显缩短。然而,在 CRT 组(B 组)中并未发现这些变化。在 6 个月的随访中,两组间 NYHA 分级和左心室功能仍无差异。
与 CRT 相比,HBP 可显著降低 T 和 T/QT。需要进一步评估这些复极指数的改善是否与临床心律失常事件的减少有关。