Suppr超能文献

希氏束起搏后的去极化和复极化动力学:与右心室起搏和固有心室传导的比较。

Depolarization and repolarization dynamics after His-bundle pacing: Comparison with right ventricular pacing and native ventricular conduction.

机构信息

Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2022 Sep;27(5):e12991. doi: 10.1111/anec.12991. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current study aimed to evaluate changes in electrical depolarization and repolarization parameters after His-bundle pacing (HBP) compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP) and its association with ventricular arrhythmia (VA).

METHODS

Forty-one patients (13 with HBP, 14 with RVP, and 14 controls [AAI mode]) were evaluated. After continuous pacing algorithm, QRS duration, QT interval, QTc, JT interval, T-peak to T-end (Tpe), and Tpe/QT ratio were measured on electrocardiography at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. We investigated VA occurrence and adverse events after implantation.

RESULTS

At 6 months, QRS duration was significantly shorter in the HBP (121.6 ± 15.6 ms) than in the RVP (150.1 ± 14.9 ms) group. The QT intervals were lower in the HBP (424.0 ± 40.9 ms) and control (405.9 ± 23.0 ms) groups than in the RVP (453.0 ± 40.2 ms) group. The Tpe and Tpe/QT ratios at 6 months differed significantly between the HBP and RVP groups (Tpe, 69.8 ± 19.7 ms vs 87.4 ± 11.9 ms and Tpe/QT, 0.16 ± 0.03 vs 0.19 ± 0.02, respectively). The Tpe and Tpe/QT ratios were similarly shortened in the HBP and control groups. VA occurred less frequently in the HBP (15%) and control (7.1%) groups than in the RVP (50%) group (p = 0.020). The non-RVP group showed significantly lower rates of VA and major adverse events than the RVP group. Patients with VA demonstrated significantly longer QRS duration, QT interval, Tpe, and Tpe/QT at 6 months than those without VA.

CONCLUSION

HBP showed better depolarization and repolarization stability than RVP.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估希氏束起搏(HBP)与右心室起搏(RVP)后电除极和复极参数的变化及其与室性心律失常(VA)的关系。

方法

评估了 41 名患者(13 名 HBP、14 名 RVP 和 14 名对照[AAI 模式])。在连续起搏算法后,在基线和术后 1 周、1 个月和 6 个月时在心电图上测量 QRS 持续时间、QT 间期、QTc、JT 间期、T 峰值至 T 末(Tpe)和 Tpe/QT 比值。我们研究了植入后的 VA 发生和不良事件。

结果

在 6 个月时,HBP 组(121.6±15.6ms)的 QRS 持续时间明显短于 RVP 组(150.1±14.9ms)。HBP(424.0±40.9ms)和对照组(405.9±23.0ms)的 QT 间期低于 RVP 组(453.0±40.2ms)。6 个月时,HBP 和 RVP 组的 Tpe 和 Tpe/QT 比值差异有统计学意义(Tpe,69.8±19.7ms vs 87.4±11.9ms 和 Tpe/QT,0.16±0.03 vs 0.19±0.02)。HBP 和对照组的 Tpe 和 Tpe/QT 比值均有相似的缩短。HBP(15%)和对照组(7.1%)组的 VA 发生率低于 RVP 组(50%)(p=0.020)。非 RVP 组的 VA 和主要不良事件发生率明显低于 RVP 组。有 VA 的患者在 6 个月时的 QRS 持续时间、QT 间期、Tpe 和 Tpe/QT 明显长于无 VA 的患者。

结论

HBP 显示出比 RVP 更好的除极和复极稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3675/9484022/2f9ba77c69ba/ANEC-27-e12991-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验