Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗医师选择在社区执业模式的动机:一项定性描述性研究。

Palliative care physicians' motivations for models of practicing in the community: A qualitative descriptive study.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Palliative Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):181-188. doi: 10.1177/02692163211055022. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internationally, both primary care providers and palliative care specialists are required to address palliative care needs of our communities. Clarity on the roles of primary and specialist-level palliative care providers is needed in order to improve access to care. This study examines how community-based palliative care physicians apply their roles as palliative care specialists, what motivates them, and the impact that has on how they practice.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured virtual interviews of community-based palliative care specialists. We asked participants to describe their care processes and the factors that influence how they work.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured virtual interviews of community-based palliative care physicians in Ontario, Canada was undertaken between March and June 2020. At interview end, participants indicated whether their practice approaches aligned with one or more models depicted in a conceptual framework that includes consultation (specialist provides recommendations to the family physician) and takeover (palliative care physician takes over all care responsibility from the family physician) models.

RESULTS

Of the 14 participants, 4 worked in a consultation model, 8 in a takeover model, and 2 were transitioning to a consultation model. Different motivators were found for the two practice models. In the takeover model, palliative care physicians were primarily motivated by their relationships with patients. In the consultation model, palliative care physicians were primarily motivated by their relationships with primary care. These differing motivations corresponded to differences in the day-to-day processes and outcomes of care.

CONCLUSIONS

The physician's personal or internal motivators were drivers in their practice style of takeover versus consultative palliative care models. Awareness of these motivations can aid our understanding of current models of care and help inform strategies to enhance consultative palliative care models.

摘要

背景

在国际上,初级保健提供者和姑息治疗专家都需要满足社区的姑息治疗需求。为了改善护理的可及性,需要明确初级和专科姑息治疗提供者的角色。本研究考察了社区姑息治疗医师如何应用他们作为姑息治疗专家的角色,他们的动机是什么,以及这对他们的实践方式有何影响。

设计

这是一项使用基于社区的姑息治疗专家的半结构式虚拟访谈的定性描述性研究。我们要求参与者描述他们的护理过程以及影响他们工作的因素。

地点/参与者:2020 年 3 月至 6 月期间,在加拿大安大略省进行了一项使用基于社区的姑息治疗医师的半结构式虚拟访谈的定性描述性研究。在访谈结束时,参与者表示他们的实践方法是否符合概念框架中描述的一种或多种模式,该框架包括咨询(专家向家庭医生提供建议)和接管(姑息治疗医生从家庭医生手中接管所有护理责任)模式。

结果

在 14 名参与者中,4 人采用咨询模式,8 人采用接管模式,2 人正在向咨询模式过渡。两种实践模式的动机不同。在接管模式中,姑息治疗医生主要受与患者关系的驱动。在咨询模式中,姑息治疗医生主要受与初级保健的关系驱动。这些不同的动机对应于护理过程和结果的日常差异。

结论

医生的个人或内部动机是他们采用接管与咨询姑息治疗模式的实践风格的驱动因素。了解这些动机可以帮助我们理解当前的护理模式,并有助于制定加强咨询姑息治疗模式的策略。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Non-specialist palliative care: A principle-based concept analysis.非专业人员姑息治疗:基于原则的概念分析。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;33(6):634-649. doi: 10.1177/0269216319840963. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验