Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada.
Kingston General Hospital Research Institute, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada.
J Clin Anesth. 2022 May;77:110630. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110630. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
To characterize the accuracy of epidural waveform analysis (EWA) in assessing the functionality of thoracic epidural catheters in the immediate postoperative period (primary objective), and to determine the inter-rater reliability between EWA waveform observers (secondary outcome).
Single center, prospective diagnostic accuracy cohort study.
Post-anesthetic care unit of a university teaching hospital.
84 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic, gynecologic, vascular, urologic, or general surgery with preoperative placement of a thoracic epidural catheter for perioperative analgesia.
EWA tracings were video recorded in the immediate postoperative period through the epidural catheter in the post-anesthetic care unit.
Postoperative EWA tracings were compared with clinical assessments of the sensory block to ice produced by epidural local anesthetic in the immediate postoperative period. Additionally, intra-class correlation analysis of agreement between 3 independent (and blinded) EWA waveform observers was carried out.
Among 80 patients with thoracic epidurals who completed the study protocol, 73 demonstrated postoperative functional epidurals with sensory block to ice and 7 demonstrated non-functional epidurals. EWA yielded 65 true positives, 6 true negatives, 8 false negatives, and 1 false positive. Postoperative EWA sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, along with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 89% (79-95%), 86% (42-100%), 98% (92-100%), and 43% (18-71%) respectively. Intra-class correlation between waveform assessors was 0.870 (95% CI 0.818-0.910, p < 0.001).
EWA is useful in assessing the position of thoracic epidural catheters in the immediate postoperative period, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity as well as robust inter-rater reliability. For patients in whom sensory block to ice cannot be reliably assessed postoperatively, EWA may provide a useful adjunct for assessing epidural functionality.
描述硬膜外波形分析(EWA)在评估术后即刻胸段硬膜外导管功能中的准确性(主要目标),并确定 EWA 波形观察者之间的组内信度(次要结局)。
单中心前瞻性诊断准确性队列研究。
大学教学医院的麻醉后护理单元。
84 例择期行胸、妇科、血管、泌尿科或普外科手术的成年患者,术前在围术期镇痛中放置胸段硬膜外导管。
在麻醉后护理单元通过硬膜外导管对术后即刻 EWA 描记进行视频记录。
术后 EWA 描记与术后即刻硬膜外局麻药引起的冰感感觉阻滞的临床评估进行比较。此外,还对 3 名独立(盲法)的 EWA 波形观察者之间的一致性进行了组内相关分析。
在完成研究方案的 80 例胸段硬膜外患者中,73 例术后硬膜外导管具有冰感感觉阻滞,表现为功能性硬膜外导管,7 例为非功能性硬膜外导管。EWA 产生 65 个真阳性、6 个真阴性、8 个假阴性和 1 个假阳性。术后 EWA 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值及其 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 89%(79-95%)、86%(42-100%)、98%(92-100%)和 43%(18-71%)。波形评估者之间的组内相关系数为 0.870(95%CI 0.818-0.910,p<0.001)。
EWA 可用于评估术后即刻胸段硬膜外导管的位置,具有较高的敏感性和特异性,以及可靠的组内信度。对于术后无法可靠评估冰感的患者,EWA 可能是评估硬膜外功能的有用辅助手段。