Kumar Kamal, Horner Fuhazia, Aly Mohamed, Nair Gopakumar S, Lin Cheng
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London N6A 5W9, ON, Canada.
Department of London Health Sciences, Victoria Hospital, London N6A 5W9, ON, Canada.
World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 9;13(3):94157. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157.
Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) has been the gold standard of perioperative analgesia in various abdominal and thoracic surgeries. However, misplaced or displaced catheters, along with other factors such as technical challenges, equipment failure, and anatomic variation, lead to a high incidence of unsatisfactory analgesia. This article aims to assess the different sources of TEA failure and strategies to validate the location of thoracic epidural catheters. A literature search of PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was done. The search results were limited to randomized controlled trials. Literature suggests techniques such as electrophysiological stimulation, epidural waveform monitoring, and x-ray epidurography for identifying thoracic epidural placement, but there is no one particular superior confirmation method; clinicians are advised to select techniques that are practical and suitable for their patients and practice environment to maximize success.
胸段硬膜外麻醉(TEA)一直是各种腹部和胸部手术围手术期镇痛的金标准。然而,导管误置或移位,以及技术挑战、设备故障和解剖变异等其他因素,导致镇痛效果不理想的发生率很高。本文旨在评估TEA失败的不同原因以及验证胸段硬膜外导管位置的策略。我们对PubMed、Medline、Science Direct和谷歌学术进行了文献检索。检索结果仅限于随机对照试验。文献表明,诸如电生理刺激、硬膜外波形监测和X线硬膜造影等技术可用于确定胸段硬膜外导管的位置,但没有一种特别优越的确认方法;建议临床医生选择实用且适合其患者和实践环境的技术,以最大限度地提高成功率。