Suppr超能文献

胸外科围手术期的胸段硬膜外麻醉和镇痛:左旋布比卡因与布比卡因。

Thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia during the perioperative period of thoracic surgery: levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Jun;25(3):449-54. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Sep 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine on block features, intraoperative hemodynamics, and postoperative analgesia for thoracic surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received thoracic epidural catheterization either with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine. A bolus of 0.1 mL/kg of 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine was administered, and infusion of the same drug with 0.25% concentration was started at 0.1 mL/kg/h. General anesthesia was induced after assessing the sensory block and maintained with 0.3% to 0.8% isoflurane and 50% O(2) in air. Epidural patient-controlled analgesia with the same agent was started at the end of the operation for 48 hours postoperatively.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sensory block features such as onset time and spread were assessed for the next 20 minutes after the bolus dose. Heart rate and systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures were recorded intraoperatively and postoperatively. Pain at rest and activity was evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) for 48 hours after the operation. All patients were comparable with respect to the demographic data. Onset time of the block and the number of blocked dermatomes and hemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups. All VAS assessments were comparable between groups except VAS at the 36th hour postoperative, which was higher in the levobupivacaine group (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic epidural anesthesia with either levobupivacaine or bupivacaine provided comparable sensory block features, intraoperative hemodynamics, and postoperative analgesia for thoracic surgery.

摘要

目的

比较左旋布比卡因和布比卡因用于胸段硬膜外麻醉对阻滞特点、术中血流动力学和术后胸科手术镇痛的影响。

设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

地点

一所大学医院。

参与者

50 例行胸科手术的患者。

干预措施

患者接受左旋布比卡因或布比卡因胸段硬膜外导管置管。给予 0.1ml/kg 的 0.25%左旋布比卡因或 0.25%布比卡因负荷剂量,然后以 0.1ml/kg/h 的速度开始输注相同药物的 0.25%浓度。评估感觉阻滞后,诱导全身麻醉,并用 0.3%至 0.8%异氟烷和 50%氧气维持麻醉。手术结束时开始使用相同药物进行硬膜外患者自控镇痛,持续 48 小时。

测量和主要结果

在负荷剂量后接下来的 20 分钟内评估感觉阻滞特征,如起效时间和扩散范围。术中及术后记录心率和收缩压、舒张压及平均动脉压。术后 48 小时用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估静息和活动时的疼痛。所有患者的人口统计学数据均相似。两组患者的阻滞起效时间、阻滞皮节数和血流动力学参数相似。两组间所有 VAS 评估均相似,但术后 36 小时的 VAS 评分较高(p = 0.039)。

结论

左旋布比卡因和布比卡因用于胸段硬膜外麻醉对胸科手术提供了相似的感觉阻滞特点、术中血流动力学和术后镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验