Medical Museion, Department of Public Health and Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Medical Museion, Department of Public Health and Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (CBMR), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2022 Feb;91:148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
Microbiome research shows that human health is foundationally intertwined with the ecology of microbial communities living on and in our bodies. This challenges the categorical separation of organisms from environments that has been central to biomedicine, and questions the boundaries between them. Biomedicine is left with an empirical problem: how to understand causal pathways between host health, microbiota and environment? We propose a conceptual tool - environmentality - to think through this problem. Environmentality is the state or quality of being an environment for something else in a particular context: a fully perspectival proposition. Its power lies partly in what Isabelle Stengers has called the efficacy of the word itself, contrasting the dominant sense of the word environment as something both external and fixed. Through three case studies, we argue that environmentality can help think about the causality of microbiota vis-a-vis host health in a processual, relational and situated manner, across scales and temporalities. We situate this intervention within historical trajectories of thought in biomedicine, focusing on the challenge microbiome research poses to an aperspectival body. We argue that addressing entanglements between microbial and human lives requires that the environment is brought into the clinic, thus shortening the conceptual gap between medicine and public health.
微生物组研究表明,人类健康与生活在我们体内和体表的微生物群落的生态基础紧密交织。这对一直以来作为生物医学核心的生物与环境的分类隔离提出了挑战,并对两者之间的界限提出了质疑。生物医学面临着一个经验问题:如何理解宿主健康、微生物组和环境之间的因果关系?我们提出了一个概念工具——环境性,以思考这个问题。环境性是指在特定背景下,某物作为其他事物的环境的状态或质量:一个完全透视的命题。它的力量部分在于伊莎贝尔·斯特恩斯(Isabelle Stengers)所说的这个词本身的功效,与环境这个词作为外部和固定的东西的主导意义形成对比。通过三个案例研究,我们认为,环境性可以帮助我们以过程性、关系性和情境性的方式,在不同的尺度和时间内,思考微生物组相对于宿主健康的因果关系。我们将这种干预置于生物医学思想的历史轨迹中,重点关注微生物组研究对无透视身体提出的挑战。我们认为,要解决微生物和人类生活之间的纠缠,就需要将环境引入临床,从而缩小医学和公共卫生之间的概念差距。