Suppr超能文献

寻求堕胎者对孕周自我评估的准确性。

Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion.

作者信息

Ralph Lauren J, Ehrenreich Katherine, Barar Rana, Biggs M Antonia, Morris Natalie, Blanchard Kelly, Kapp Nathalie, Moayedi Ghazaleh, Perritt Jamila, Raymond Elizabeth G, White Kari, Grossman Daniel

机构信息

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health research group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA.

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health research group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):710.e1-710.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1373. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mifepristone, used together with misoprostol, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for medication abortion through 10 weeks' gestation. Although in-person ultrasound is frequently used to establish medication abortion eligibility, previous research demonstrates that people seeking abortion early in pregnancy can accurately self-assess gestational duration using the date of their last menstrual period.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we establish the screening performance of a broader set of questions for self-assessment of gestational duration among a sample of people seeking abortion at a wide range of gestations.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed patients seeking abortion at 7 facilities before ultrasound and compared self-assessments of gestational duration using 11 pregnancy dating questions with measurements on ultrasound. For individual pregnancy dating questions and combined questions, we established screening performance focusing on metrics of diagnostic accuracy, defined as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity (or the proportion of ineligible participants who correctly screened as ineligible for medication abortion), and proportion of false negatives (ie, the proportion of all participants who erroneously screened as eligible for medication abortion). We tested for differences in sensitivity across individual and combined questions using McNemar's test, and for differences in accuracy using the area under the receiver operating curve and Sidak adjusted P values.

RESULTS

One-quarter (25%) of 1089 participants had a gestational duration of >70 days on ultrasound. Using the date of last menstrual period alone demonstrated 83.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 78.4-87.9) in identifying participants with gestational durations of >70 days on ultrasound, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.85) and a proportion of false negatives of 4.0%. A composite measure of responses to questions on number of weeks pregnant, date of last menstrual period, and date they got pregnant demonstrated 89.1% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 84.7-92.6) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.88), with 2.7% of false negatives. A simpler question set focused on being >10 weeks or >2 months pregnant or having missed 2 or more periods had comparable sensitivity (90.7%; 95% confidence interval, 86.6-93.9) and proportion of false negatives (2.3%), but with a slightly lower area under the receiver operating curve (0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.84).

CONCLUSION

In a sample representative of people seeking abortion nationally, broadening the screening questions for assessing gestational duration beyond the date of the last menstrual period resulted in improved accuracy and sensitivity of self-assessment at the 70-day threshold for medication abortion. Ultrasound assessment for medication abortion may not be necessary, especially when requiring ultrasound could increase COVID-19 risk or healthcare costs, restrict access, or limit patient choice.

摘要

背景

米非司酮与米索前列醇联合使用,已获美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于妊娠10周内的药物流产。虽然常常通过现场超声检查来确定是否适合进行药物流产,但先前的研究表明,妊娠早期寻求流产的女性可以根据末次月经日期准确地自行评估孕周。

目的

在本研究中,我们针对广泛孕周范围内寻求流产的女性样本,确定一组更广泛的问题用于自我评估孕周的筛查性能。

研究设计

我们在超声检查前对7家机构中寻求流产的患者进行了调查,并将使用11个孕周确定问题进行的孕周自我评估结果与超声测量结果进行了比较。对于各个孕周确定问题及组合问题,我们重点根据诊断准确性指标(定义为受试者操作特征曲线下面积)、敏感性(即正确筛查出不符合药物流产条件的非合格参与者的比例)和假阴性比例(即所有被错误筛查为符合药物流产条件的参与者的比例)来确定筛查性能。我们使用McNemar检验来检测各个问题及组合问题之间敏感性的差异,并使用受试者操作曲线下面积和Sidak校正P值来检测准确性的差异。

结果

1089名参与者中,四分之一(25%)的超声检查孕周>70天。仅使用末次月经日期在识别超声检查孕周>70天的参与者时,敏感性为83.5%(95%置信区间为78.4 - 87.9),受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.82(95%置信区间为0.79 - 0.85),假阴性比例为4.0%。对怀孕周数、末次月经日期及受孕日期问题的回答进行综合测量时,敏感性为89.1%(95%置信区间为84.7 - 92.6),受试者操作曲线下面积为0.86(95%置信区间为0.83 - 0.88),假阴性比例为2.7%。一组更简单的问题,即关注怀孕是否>10周或>2个月或月经推迟是否>2个周期,具有相当的敏感性(90.7%;95%置信区间为86.6 - 93.9)和假阴性比例(2.3%),但受试者操作曲线下面积略低(0.82;95%置信区间为0.79 - 0.84)。

结论

在一个全国范围内寻求流产女性的代表性样本中,将评估孕周的筛查问题范围扩大到末次月经日期之外,可提高药物流产70天阈值时自我评估的准确性和敏感性。药物流产的超声评估可能并非必要,特别是在要求进行超声检查会增加感染新冠病毒的风险或医疗成本、限制就医机会或限制患者选择的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验