• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻求堕胎者对孕周自我评估的准确性。

Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion.

作者信息

Ralph Lauren J, Ehrenreich Katherine, Barar Rana, Biggs M Antonia, Morris Natalie, Blanchard Kelly, Kapp Nathalie, Moayedi Ghazaleh, Perritt Jamila, Raymond Elizabeth G, White Kari, Grossman Daniel

机构信息

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health research group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA.

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health research group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):710.e1-710.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1373. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1373
PMID:34922922
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mifepristone, used together with misoprostol, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for medication abortion through 10 weeks' gestation. Although in-person ultrasound is frequently used to establish medication abortion eligibility, previous research demonstrates that people seeking abortion early in pregnancy can accurately self-assess gestational duration using the date of their last menstrual period.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we establish the screening performance of a broader set of questions for self-assessment of gestational duration among a sample of people seeking abortion at a wide range of gestations.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed patients seeking abortion at 7 facilities before ultrasound and compared self-assessments of gestational duration using 11 pregnancy dating questions with measurements on ultrasound. For individual pregnancy dating questions and combined questions, we established screening performance focusing on metrics of diagnostic accuracy, defined as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity (or the proportion of ineligible participants who correctly screened as ineligible for medication abortion), and proportion of false negatives (ie, the proportion of all participants who erroneously screened as eligible for medication abortion). We tested for differences in sensitivity across individual and combined questions using McNemar's test, and for differences in accuracy using the area under the receiver operating curve and Sidak adjusted P values.

RESULTS

One-quarter (25%) of 1089 participants had a gestational duration of >70 days on ultrasound. Using the date of last menstrual period alone demonstrated 83.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 78.4-87.9) in identifying participants with gestational durations of >70 days on ultrasound, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.85) and a proportion of false negatives of 4.0%. A composite measure of responses to questions on number of weeks pregnant, date of last menstrual period, and date they got pregnant demonstrated 89.1% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 84.7-92.6) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.88), with 2.7% of false negatives. A simpler question set focused on being >10 weeks or >2 months pregnant or having missed 2 or more periods had comparable sensitivity (90.7%; 95% confidence interval, 86.6-93.9) and proportion of false negatives (2.3%), but with a slightly lower area under the receiver operating curve (0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.84).

CONCLUSION

In a sample representative of people seeking abortion nationally, broadening the screening questions for assessing gestational duration beyond the date of the last menstrual period resulted in improved accuracy and sensitivity of self-assessment at the 70-day threshold for medication abortion. Ultrasound assessment for medication abortion may not be necessary, especially when requiring ultrasound could increase COVID-19 risk or healthcare costs, restrict access, or limit patient choice.

摘要

背景

米非司酮与米索前列醇联合使用,已获美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于妊娠10周内的药物流产。虽然常常通过现场超声检查来确定是否适合进行药物流产,但先前的研究表明,妊娠早期寻求流产的女性可以根据末次月经日期准确地自行评估孕周。

目的

在本研究中,我们针对广泛孕周范围内寻求流产的女性样本,确定一组更广泛的问题用于自我评估孕周的筛查性能。

研究设计

我们在超声检查前对7家机构中寻求流产的患者进行了调查,并将使用11个孕周确定问题进行的孕周自我评估结果与超声测量结果进行了比较。对于各个孕周确定问题及组合问题,我们重点根据诊断准确性指标(定义为受试者操作特征曲线下面积)、敏感性(即正确筛查出不符合药物流产条件的非合格参与者的比例)和假阴性比例(即所有被错误筛查为符合药物流产条件的参与者的比例)来确定筛查性能。我们使用McNemar检验来检测各个问题及组合问题之间敏感性的差异,并使用受试者操作曲线下面积和Sidak校正P值来检测准确性的差异。

结果

1089名参与者中,四分之一(25%)的超声检查孕周>70天。仅使用末次月经日期在识别超声检查孕周>70天的参与者时,敏感性为83.5%(95%置信区间为78.4 - 87.9),受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.82(95%置信区间为0.79 - 0.85),假阴性比例为4.0%。对怀孕周数、末次月经日期及受孕日期问题的回答进行综合测量时,敏感性为89.1%(95%置信区间为84.7 - 92.6),受试者操作曲线下面积为0.86(95%置信区间为0.83 - 0.88),假阴性比例为2.7%。一组更简单的问题,即关注怀孕是否>10周或>2个月或月经推迟是否>2个周期,具有相当的敏感性(90.7%;95%置信区间为86.6 - 93.9)和假阴性比例(2.3%),但受试者操作曲线下面积略低(0.82;95%置信区间为0.79 - 0.84)。

结论

在一个全国范围内寻求流产女性的代表性样本中,将评估孕周的筛查问题范围扩大到末次月经日期之外,可提高药物流产70天阈值时自我评估的准确性和敏感性。药物流产的超声评估可能并非必要,特别是在要求进行超声检查会增加感染新冠病毒的风险或医疗成本、限制就医机会或限制患者选择的情况下。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion.寻求堕胎者对孕周自我评估的准确性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):710.e1-710.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1373. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
2
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.“我将独自处理这件事”:对美国自主堕胎经历的定性探索。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7.
3
Early termination of pregnancy: differences in gestational age estimation using last menstrual period and ultrasound in Mexico.早期妊娠终止:末次月经与超声在墨西哥估计胎龄的差异。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 9;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00914-x.
4
Management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol: clinical predictors of treatment success from a randomized trial.米非司酮和米索前列醇治疗早期妊娠丢失:一项随机试验的治疗成功的临床预测因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):551.e1-551.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Risk factors for surgical intervention of early medical abortion.早期药物流产行手术干预的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):478.e1-478.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
Accuracy of gestational age estimation from last menstrual period among women seeking abortion in South Africa, with a view to task sharing: a mixed methods study.在南非寻求堕胎的女性中,根据末次月经估计胎龄的准确性,以期实现任务分担:一项混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2017 Aug 22;14(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0365-7.
7
Efficacy of a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test for identifying ongoing pregnancy after medication abortion at 64 to 70 days of gestation.妊娠 64-70 天药物流产后低敏尿妊娠试验识别持续妊娠的效果。
Contraception. 2022 Jun;110:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
8
Randomized trial of misoprostol and cervagem in combination with a reduced dose of mifepristone for induction of abortion.米索前列醇与宫颈扩张凝胶联合小剂量米非司酮用于引产的随机试验。
Hum Reprod. 1995 Jun;10(6):1521-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.6.1521.
9
Expulsion at home for early medical abortion: A systematic review with meta-analyses.在家中进行早期药物流产:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Apr;100(4):727-735. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14025. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
10
Experiences with misoprostol-only used for self-managed abortion and acquired from an online or retail pharmacy in the United States.仅使用米索前列醇并从美国的在线或零售药店自行获取用于人工流产的经历。
Contraception. 2024 Mar;131:110345. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110345. Epub 2023 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
No-Test Screening Protocols May Disproportionately Exclude Structurally Oppressed Communities Who Could Benefit from Accessing Medication Abortion.无检测筛查方案可能会不成比例地排除那些能够从药物流产中获益的受结构性压迫的群体。
Health Equity. 2025 Mar 26;9(1):189-200. doi: 10.1089/heq.2024.0128. eCollection 2025.
2
Feasibility of medication abortion self-care service delivery in Ghana.在加纳提供药物流产自我护理服务的可行性。
Reprod Health. 2025 May 2;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02021-1.
3
Imagining Coat-Hangers and Pills: A Qualitative Exploration of Abortion Beliefs and Attitudes in Hostile Policy Contexts in the United States.
想象衣架与药丸:对美国敌对政策背景下堕胎观念与态度的质性探索
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):25-35. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12289. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
Telemedicine for the provision of medication abortion to pregnant people at up to twelve weeks of pregnancy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.将怀孕 12 周内的孕妇提供药物流产的远程医疗:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 19;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01864-4.
5
Effectiveness and safety of telehealth medication abortion in the USA.美国远程医疗药物流产的有效性和安全性。
Nat Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):1191-1198. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02834-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
6
Medication Abortion Safety and Effectiveness With Misoprostol Alone.单独使用米索前列醇的药物流产安全性和有效性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2340042. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40042.
7
Self-Managed Abortion in the United States.美国的自我管理堕胎
Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2023;12(2):70-75. doi: 10.1007/s13669-023-00354-x. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
8
Self-diagnosing the end of pregnancy after medication abortion.药物流产后自我诊断妊娠结束。
Cult Health Sex. 2024 Mar;26(3):405-420. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2212298. Epub 2023 May 22.
9
Comprehension of an Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Prototype for a Mifepristone and Misoprostol Medication Abortion Product.理解米非司酮和米索前列醇药物流产产品的非处方药物事实标签原型。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1111-1122. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004757. Epub 2022 May 2.