Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7.
A growing body of evidence indicates that some people seek options to terminate a pregnancy without medical assistance, but experiences doing so have largely been documented only among people accessing a clinic-based abortion. We aim to describe self-managed abortion (SMA) experiences of people recruited outside of clinics, including their motivations for SMA, pregnancy confirmation and decision-making processes, method choices, and clinical outcomes.
In 2017, we conducted 14 in-depth interviews with self-identified females of reproductive age who recently reported in an online survey administered to Ipsos' KnowledgePanel that, since 2000, they had attempted SMA while living in the United States. We asked participants about their reproductive histories, experiences seeking reproductive health care, and SMA experiences. We used an iterative process to develop codes and analyzed transcripts using thematic content analysis methods.
Motivations and perceptions of effectiveness varied by whether participants had confirmed the pregnancy prior to SMA. Participants who confirmed their pregnancies chose SMA because it was convenient, accessible, and private. Those who did not test for pregnancy were motivated by a preference for autonomy and felt empowered by the ability to try something on their own before seeking facility-based care. Participants prioritized methods that were safe and available, though not always effective. Most used herbs or over-the-counter medications; none used self-sourced abortion medications, mifepristone and/or misoprostol. Five participants obtained facility-based abortions and one participant decided to continue the pregnancy after attempting SMA. The remaining eight reported being no longer pregnant after SMA. None of the participants sought care for SMA complications; one participant saw a provider to confirm abortion completion.
There are many types of SMA experiences. In addition to those who pursue SMA as a last resort (after facing barriers to facility-based care) or as a first resort (because they prefer homeopathic remedies), our findings show that some individuals view SMA as a potential interim step worth trying after suspecting pregnancy and before accessing facility-based care. These people in particular would benefit from a medication abortion product available over the counter, online, or in the form of a missed-period pill.
越来越多的证据表明,有些人在没有医疗帮助的情况下寻求终止妊娠的选择,但这些经历主要记录在到诊所进行堕胎的人群中。我们旨在描述在诊所外招募的人自行管理的堕胎(SMA)经验,包括他们进行 SMA 的动机、怀孕确认和决策过程、方法选择以及临床结果。
2017 年,我们对 14 名自我认定为育龄女性进行了深入访谈,她们最近在 Ipsos KnowledgePanel 上进行的在线调查中报告说,自 2000 年以来,她们曾在美国尝试过自行管理堕胎。我们询问了参与者的生殖史、寻求生殖保健的经历以及 SMA 经验。我们使用迭代过程开发代码,并使用主题内容分析方法分析转录本。
在 SMA 之前确认怀孕与否决定了参与者的动机和对有效性的认知。确认怀孕的参与者选择 SMA 是因为它方便、可及且私密。那些没有进行怀孕测试的人则是出于自主的偏好,并且能够在寻求机构护理之前自行尝试感到有力量。参与者优先考虑安全且可获得的方法,尽管并非总是有效。大多数人使用草药或非处方药物;没有人使用自行购买的堕胎药物,米非司酮和/或米索前列醇。五名参与者获得了机构堕胎,一名参与者在尝试 SMA 后决定继续怀孕。其余八人报告说在 SMA 后不再怀孕。没有参与者因 SMA 并发症寻求治疗;一名参与者去看医生以确认堕胎是否完成。
SMA 经验有很多种。除了那些因面临机构护理障碍而将 SMA 作为最后手段(在面临机构护理障碍后)或作为第一手段(因为他们更喜欢顺势疗法)的人之外,我们的研究结果表明,一些人将 SMA 视为在怀疑怀孕后和在获得机构护理之前值得尝试的潜在临时步骤。特别是这些人将受益于一种可在柜台、在线或作为错过经期药丸形式提供的非处方药物堕胎产品。