• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少高收入国家弱势群体中的生活方式风险行为:系统评价的范围综述。

Reducing lifestyle risk behaviours in disadvantaged groups in high-income countries: A scoping review of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106916. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106916. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106916
PMID:34922995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8803546/
Abstract

High prevalence of risk behaviours may exacerbate existing poor health in disadvantaged groups. We aimed to identify and bring together systematic reviews with a focus on reducing risk behaviours in disadvantaged groups and highlight where evidence is lacking. We searched MEDLINE and Embase up to October 2020, with supplementary searching in Epistemonikos and Health Systems Evidence. We included systematic reviews that reported behavioural outcomes and targeted smoking, excessive alcohol use, unhealthy diet, or physical inactivity in groups with the following characteristics: low income or low socio-economic status (SES), unemployed people, homeless people, care leavers, prisoners, refugees or asylum seeker, Gypsies, Travellers, or Roma, people with learning disabilities and people living in disadvantaged areas. Reviews that included primary studies from any high-income country were eligible. Reviews were mapped based on the disadvantaged group(s) and behaviour(s) targeted. Ninety-two reviews were included, with the majority (n = 63) focusing on people with low income or low SES. We identified gaps in the evidence for care leavers; Gypsies, Travellers, and Roma and limited evidence for refugees and unemployed people. Few reviews targeted alcohol use. There was limited evidence on barriers and facilitators to behaviour change. This suggests there is insufficient evidence to inform policy and practice and new reviews or primary studies may be required.

摘要

高风险行为的普遍存在可能会使弱势群体的健康状况恶化。我们旨在确定并汇集重点关注减少弱势群体风险行为的系统评价,并强调证据的缺乏之处。我们检索了 MEDLINE 和 Embase,截至 2020 年 10 月,并在 Epistemonikos 和卫生系统证据中进行了补充检索。我们纳入了报告行为结果且针对以下特征人群的吸烟、过度饮酒、不健康饮食或缺乏身体活动的系统评价:低收入或低社会经济地位(SES)、失业者、无家可归者、离开照顾环境的人、囚犯、难民或寻求庇护者、吉普赛人、游民或罗姆人、有学习障碍的人和生活在贫困地区的人。符合条件的系统评价包括来自任何高收入国家的原始研究。系统评价根据目标弱势群体和行为进行了映射。共纳入了 92 项系统评价,其中大多数(n=63)针对低收入或低 SES 的人群。我们发现,对于离开照顾环境的人、吉普赛人、游民和罗姆人,以及难民和失业者,证据存在差距。针对饮酒的系统评价较少。关于行为改变的障碍和促进因素的证据有限。这表明没有足够的证据来为政策和实践提供信息,可能需要新的系统评价或原始研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/0df2c4ef1df8/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/3cd9d957097e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/791bc31bd76b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/f5af9ee72cb7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/ceebd727cee3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/9aa94c3c9fd6/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/0df2c4ef1df8/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/3cd9d957097e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/791bc31bd76b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/f5af9ee72cb7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/ceebd727cee3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/9aa94c3c9fd6/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c42/8803546/0df2c4ef1df8/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing lifestyle risk behaviours in disadvantaged groups in high-income countries: A scoping review of systematic reviews.减少高收入国家弱势群体中的生活方式风险行为:系统评价的范围综述。
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106916. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106916. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
2
Understanding the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of lifestyle modification interventions in adults with learning disabilities: a mixed-methods systematic review.了解针对有学习障碍的成年人进行生活方式改变干预的有效性及潜在机制:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Feb;29(4):1-168. doi: 10.3310/BSTG4556.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.促进低收入和中等收入国家采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)技术的干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;17(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1194. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
The effectiveness of smoking cessation, alcohol reduction, diet and physical activity interventions in changing behaviours during pregnancy: A systematic review of systematic reviews.戒烟、减少饮酒、饮食和体育活动干预措施在改变孕期行为方面的有效性:系统评价的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0232774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232774. eCollection 2020.
7
Community-based supplementary feeding for food insecure, vulnerable and malnourished populations - an overview of systematic reviews.针对粮食不安全、脆弱及营养不良人群的社区补充喂养——系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 9;11(11):CD010578. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010578.pub2.
8
Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.针对年轻人多种风险行为的个人、家庭和学校层面的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 5;10(10):CD009927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009927.pub2.
9
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
10
Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake and Maintenance of Healthy Behaviours by People at Mid-Life: A Rapid Systematic Review.中年人群健康行为采纳与维持的障碍及促进因素:一项快速系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 27;11(1):e0145074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145074. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobile Application Intervention for Prevention of Multiple Risk Behaviors among Thai Female Adolescents: A Quasi-experimental Study.泰国女性青少年多重风险行为预防的移动应用程序干预:一项准实验研究。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2025 Jul 1;13(3):180-190. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2025.104901.2667. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Contextual factors in systematic reviews: understanding public health interventions in low socioeconomic status and disadvantaged populations.系统评价中的背景因素:理解低社会经济地位和弱势群体中的公共卫生干预措施。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;83(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01644-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Poverty, health, and covid-19.贫困、健康与新冠疫情
BMJ. 2021 Feb 12;372:n376. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n376.
2
Changing behaviour: an essential component of tackling health inequalities.改变行为:解决健康不平等问题的重要组成部分。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 10;372:n332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n332.
3
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 87 种风险因素的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Evaluation of Co-Developed Strategies to Support Staff of a Mental Health Community Managed Organisation Implement Preventive Care: A Pilot Controlled Trial.
评估共同制定的策略以支持精神卫生社区管理组织的工作人员实施预防保健:一项试点对照试验。
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Apr;36(2):e70018. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70018.
4
Data visualisation in scoping reviews and evidence maps on health topics: a cross-sectional analysis.健康主题范围综述和证据图谱中的数据可视化:一项横断面分析。
Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 17;12(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02309-y.
5
Low- and Medium-Socioeconomic-Status Group Members' Perceived Challenges and Solutions for Healthy Nutrition: Qualitative Focus Group Study.低社会经济地位和中等社会经济地位群体成员对健康营养的认知挑战与解决方案:定性焦点小组研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Dec 2;9(4):e40123. doi: 10.2196/40123.
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
4
Inequalities, harm reduction and non-combustible nicotine products: a meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence.不平等、减少伤害和非燃烧型尼古丁产品:定性证据的元民族志学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09083-9.
5
The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行与卫生不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
6
Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.果蔬激励计划对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的影响:计划结构的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 4;12(6):1676. doi: 10.3390/nu12061676.
7
Dietary practices among Arabic-speaking immigrants and refugees in Western societies: A scoping review.西方社会中讲阿拉伯语的移民和难民的饮食行为:范围综述。
Appetite. 2020 Nov 1;154:104753. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104753. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
Fruit and Vegetable Purchases and Consumption among WIC Participants after the 2009 WIC Food Package Revision: A Systematic Review.2009年妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养项目食品套餐修订后该项目参与者的果蔬购买与消费情况:一项系统评价
Adv Nutr. 2020 Nov 16;11(6):1646-1662. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa060.
9
Physical Activity among Adults with Low Socioeconomic Status Living in Industrialized Countries: A Meta-Ethnographic Approach to Understanding Socioecological Complexities.工业化国家中社会经济地位较低的成年人的身体活动:理解社会生态复杂性的元民族志方法。
J Environ Public Health. 2020 Apr 1;2020:4283027. doi: 10.1155/2020/4283027. eCollection 2020.
10
Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes.对未加工糖或添加糖食品征税以减少其消费并预防肥胖或其他不良健康后果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012333.pub2.