Park Crystal L, Fritzson Emily, Gnall Katherine E, Salafia Caroline, Ligus Kaleigh, Sinnott Sinead, Bellizzi Keith M
University of Connecticut.
Res Hum Dev. 2021;18(3):197-211. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2021.1960771. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
Resilience is highly relevant in the context of cancer, and understanding how survivors adapt and potentially thrive following their diagnosis and treatment may provide insights into better supports and interventions to promote healthier survivorship. In this paper, we characterize two different ways to conceptualize and study resilience in cancer survivorship, as a trait and as a process. We focus specifically on the transition from active treatment to post-treatment survivorship. We present data from 225 cancer patients transitioning from active treatment (baseline assessment) to early survivorship (6-month follow-up). Results demonstrate that resilience assessed as a trait at baseline was unrelated to changes in survivors' mental or physical wellbeing at follow-up, but did predict a in social satisfaction and spiritual wellbeing over time. However, when resilience is conceptualized as a dynamic process, the sample showed substantial resilience on multiple aspects of wellbeing. We suggest that different ways of conceptualizing resilience--as a trait versus as a dynamic process--may lead to very different conclusions and discuss future research directions for cancer survivors and for science of resilience.
适应力在癌症背景下具有高度相关性,了解幸存者在诊断和治疗后如何适应并有可能茁壮成长,可能会为促进更健康的生存提供更好支持和干预措施的见解。在本文中,我们描述了两种不同的方法来概念化和研究癌症幸存者的适应力,即作为一种特质和作为一个过程。我们特别关注从积极治疗到治疗后生存的过渡。我们展示了225名从积极治疗(基线评估)过渡到早期生存(6个月随访)的癌症患者的数据。结果表明,在基线时作为一种特质评估的适应力与随访时幸存者的心理或身体健康变化无关,但确实预测了随着时间推移社会满意度和精神健康的提高。然而,当将适应力概念化为一个动态过程时,样本在幸福感的多个方面表现出了显著的适应力。我们认为,将适应力概念化为一种特质与作为一个动态过程的不同方式可能会导致非常不同的结论,并讨论了癌症幸存者和适应力科学的未来研究方向。