Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, University of Montreal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pierre and Marie Curie University, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2022;45(1):34-49. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000279.
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are the most common causes of disabilities for older adults. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of multimodal interventions including exercise rehabilitation for older adults with chronic MSKDs.
A literature search was conducted up to February 2019 in 5 bibliographical databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared multimodal interventions including exercise rehabilitation with usual medical care or no intervention. Randomized controlled trials were assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analyses were performed and pooled mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated.
Sixteen RCTs (n = 2322 participants) were included. One RCT was considered at low risk of bias, 8 had some concerns of bias, and 7 had a high risk of bias. Participants suffered from hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 12 RCTs), low back pain (LBP) (n = 2 RCTs) and generalized chronic pain (GCP) (n = 2 RCTs). Multimodal interventions were significantly more effective than usual care to decrease pain (visual analog scale, out of 10 points) in the short term, MD: -0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.08 to -0.34, n = 900), and in the long term: MD: -0.52 (95% CI -0.98 to -0.05, n = 575), but these differences are not considered clinically important. In terms of disabilities, multimodal interventions were also significantly more effective than usual care. The SMDs were -0.47 (95% CI -0.61 to -0.34, n = 903) and -0.29 (95% CI -0.46 to -0.13, n = 568) for OA trials in the short and long terms, respectively, and -0.47 (95% CI -0.81 to -0.12, n = 211) for LBP and GCP trials in the short term. The magnitude of these effects may be considered as small to moderate.
Multimodal intervention including exercise rehabilitation combined with usual medical care is an efficacious therapeutic option to reduce disabilities in older adults with chronic MSKDs. A significant but not clinically important effect was observed for pain. The most beneficial component of the multimodal interventions in terms of education, exercises, or medication remains to be determined.
肌肉骨骼疾病(MSKDs)是老年人残疾的最常见原因。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估包括运动康复在内的多模式干预对患有慢性 MSKD 的老年人的有效性。
截至 2019 年 2 月,我们在 5 个文献数据库中进行了文献检索,以确定比较包括运动康复在内的多模式干预与常规医疗或无干预的随机对照试验(RCTs)。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估随机对照试验。进行了荟萃分析,并计算了平均差异(MD)或标准化平均差异(SMD)。
纳入了 16 项 RCT(n=2322 名参与者)。1 项 RCT 被认为是低偏倚风险的,8 项有一些偏倚问题,7 项有高偏倚风险。参与者患有髋或膝关节骨关节炎(OA)(n=12 项 RCT)、下腰痛(LBP)(n=2 项 RCT)和全身性慢性疼痛(GCP)(n=2 项 RCT)。多模式干预在短期(视觉模拟评分,满分 10 分)和长期(MD:-0.71,95%置信区间[CI] -1.08 至 -0.34,n=900))显著优于常规护理更有效地减轻疼痛,且这些差异在临床上并不重要。在残疾方面,多模式干预也明显优于常规护理。OA 试验的 SMDs 分别为短期:-0.47(95% CI -0.61 至 -0.34,n=903)和长期:-0.52(95% CI -0.98 至 -0.05,n=575),而 LBP 和 GCP 试验的 SMDs 为短期:-0.47(95% CI -0.81 至 -0.12,n=211)。这些影响的幅度可能被认为是小到中等。
包括运动康复在内的多模式干预结合常规医疗是治疗患有慢性 MSKD 的老年人残疾的有效治疗选择。疼痛方面观察到了显著但无临床意义的效果。在教育、运动或药物方面,多模式干预最有益的组成部分仍有待确定。