Accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography for assessing breast cancer tumor size-comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND

Accurate preoperative assessment of tumor size is important in developing a surgical plan for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of tumor size and to analyze the factors influencing the discordance.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with breast cancer who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CBBCT (CE-CBBCT) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and received a complete pathologic diagnosis from August 2020 to December 2021 were included, using the pathological result as the gold standard. Two radiologists assessed the CBBCT and MRI features and measured the tumor size with a 2-week washout period. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess inter-observer reproducibility and agreement based on CBBCT, MRI and pathology. Univariate analyses of differences in clinical, pathological and CBBCT/MRI features between the concordant and discordant groups was performed using the -test, Mann-Whitney -test, Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with discordance of CBBCT/MRI with pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 115 female breast cancer patients (115 lesions) were included. All patients had a single malignant tumor of the unilateral breast. The reproducibility and the agreement ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC =0.607-0.983). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that the cut-off values of CBBCT-pathology and MRI-pathology discordance were 2.25 and 2.65 cm, respectively. CBBCT/MRI-pathology concordance was significantly associated with the extent of pathology, lesion type, presence of calcification, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and fatty infiltration (P<0.05). In lesions containing calcification, the difference of CBBCT-pathology was significantly smaller than MRI-pathology (P=0.021). Non-mass enhancement (NME) was the main predictor of CBBCT- or MRI-pathology discordance [odds ratio (OR) =3.293-6.469, P<0.05], and HER2 positivity was a predictor of CBBCT-pathology discordance (OR =3.514, P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

CBBCT and MRI have comparable accuracy in measurement of tumor size, and CBBCT is advantageous in assessing the size of calcified lesions. NME and HER2 positivity are significant predictors of CBBCT-pathology discordance. This suggests that CBBCT might serve as an alternative imaging technique to assess tumor size when patients do not tolerate MRI.