Suppr超能文献

长效注射抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物在精神分裂症患者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effect of long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications compared with oral antipsychotic medications among people with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

University of Kentucky College of Nursing, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Jun;31(3):469-535. doi: 10.1111/inm.12964. Epub 2021 Dec 20.

Abstract

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications may be an important modality of reducing costs, improving symptoms, and fostering quality of life outcomes for those with schizophrenia. Our objective was to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of LAIs compared with oral antipsychotics on medication adherence, symptom remission/relapse, rehospitalization, outpatient visits, emergency department visits, healthcare costs, and social functioning. We performed a systematic search of PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases to examine studies meeting inclusion criteria prior to August 30th, 2020. Randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, prospective studies among people with schizophrenia with at least 6-month follow-up data were obtained. Overall effect sizes and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with random-effects modeling. We found 75 articles meeting our inclusion criteria, including 341 730 individuals with schizophrenia. Systematic review results indicated that LAIs compared with orals improved medication adherence (25/29 studies), symptom remission/relapse (10/18 studies), rehospitalizations (26/49 studies), emergency department visits (9/17 studies), medical costs (11/15 studies), and social functioning (5/9 studies); however, LAIs also increased outpatient visits (7/16 studies) and pharmacy costs (10/10 studies). Meta-analytic results of studies with similar outcome measures did not find differences between LAIs and orals in respect to outcomes, except lowering emergency department visits and increasing pharmacy costs. The differences between the results of the narrative synthesis and the meta-analyses were possibly because of the low availability of studies with similar outcomes in the pooled analyses. Our overall results suggest that LAIs are at least comparable to orals in supporting important healthcare outcomes for those with schizophrenia. These findings support clinical practice in encouraging providers to prescribe LAIs when indicated.

摘要

长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药物可能是降低成本、改善症状和提高精神分裂症患者生活质量的重要手段。我们的目的是系统地回顾和进行荟萃分析,比较 LAI 与口服抗精神病药在药物依从性、症状缓解/复发、再入院、门诊就诊、急诊就诊、医疗保健费用和社会功能方面的有效性。我们在 2020 年 8 月 30 日之前对 PsycInfo、CINAHL、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统搜索,以检查符合纳入标准的研究。我们获得了随机对照试验、回顾性研究和前瞻性研究,这些研究对象均为至少有 6 个月随访数据的精神分裂症患者。使用随机效应模型估计总体效应大小和相关的 95%置信区间(CI)。我们发现了 75 篇符合纳入标准的文章,包括 341730 名精神分裂症患者。系统评价结果表明,与口服药相比,LAI 改善了药物依从性(25/29 项研究)、症状缓解/复发(10/18 项研究)、再入院(26/49 项研究)、急诊就诊(9/17 项研究)、医疗费用(11/15 项研究)和社会功能(5/9 项研究);然而,LAI 也增加了门诊就诊(7/16 项研究)和药房费用(10/10 项研究)。具有相似结局测量的研究的荟萃分析结果没有发现 LAI 与口服药在结局方面的差异,除了降低急诊就诊率和增加药房费用。叙述性综合分析和荟萃分析结果之间的差异可能是由于综合分析中具有相似结局的研究数量较少。我们的总体结果表明,LAI 至少与口服药一样,能够为精神分裂症患者提供重要的医疗保健结果。这些发现支持临床实践,鼓励提供者在适当的情况下开 LAI 处方。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验