• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生在B模式和M模式床旁超声(POCUS)上识别肺滑动伪像的评分者间一致性。

Interrater Agreement of Physicians Identifying Lung Sliding Artifact on B-Mode And M-Mode Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS).

作者信息

Prager Ross, Fiedler Hans Clausdorff, Smith Delaney, Wu Derek, Arntfield Robert

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, ON, CAN.

Sección de Medicina de Urgencia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, CHL.

出版信息

POCUS J. 2025 Apr 15;10(1):92-98. doi: 10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.17807. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.17807
PMID:40342679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12057470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chest point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a first-line diagnostic test to identify lung sliding, an important artifact to diagnose or rule out pneumothorax. Despite enthusiastic adoption of this modality, the interrater reliability for physicians to identify lung sliding is unknown. Additionally, the relative diagnostic performance of physicians interpreting B-mode and M-mode ultrasound is unclear. We sought to determine the interrater reliability of physicians to detect lung sliding on B-mode and M-mode POCUS.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional interrater agreement study surveying acute care physicians on their interpretation of 20 B-mode and M-mode POCUS clips. Two experienced clinicians determined the reference standard diagnosis. Respondents reported their interpretation of each POCUS B-mode clip or M-mode image. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement, determined by an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

From September to November 2023, there were 20 survey respondents. Fourteen (70%) respondents were resident physicians. Respondents were confident or very confident in their skill performing chest POCUS in 14 (70%) cases, with 19 (90%) performing chest POCUS every week or more frequently. The ICC on B-mode was 0.44 and for M-mode was 0.43, indicating moderate agreement. There were no significant differences in interrater reliability between subgroups of confidence or experience.

CONCLUSION

There is only moderate interrater reliability between clinicians to diagnose lung sliding. Clinicians have superior accuracy on B-mode compared to M-mode clips.

摘要

背景

床旁胸部超声(POCUS)是识别肺滑动的一线诊断测试,肺滑动是诊断或排除气胸的重要伪像。尽管这种检查方式被广泛采用,但医生识别肺滑动的评分者间可靠性尚不清楚。此外,医生解读B模式和M模式超声的相对诊断性能也不明确。我们试图确定医生在B模式和M模式POCUS上检测肺滑动的评分者间可靠性。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面评分者间一致性研究,调查急性护理医生对20个B模式和M模式POCUS片段的解读。两名经验丰富的临床医生确定参考标准诊断。受访者报告他们对每个POCUS B模式片段或M模式图像的解读。主要结果是评分者间一致性,由组内相关系数(ICC)确定。

结果

2023年9月至11月,有20名受访者。14名(70%)受访者是住院医生。14名(70%)受访者对自己进行胸部POCUS的技能有信心或非常有信心,19名(90%)受访者每周或更频繁地进行胸部POCUS。B模式的ICC为0.44,M模式的ICC为0.43,表明一致性中等。信心或经验亚组之间的评分者间可靠性没有显著差异。

结论

临床医生之间诊断肺滑动的评分者间可靠性仅为中等。与M模式片段相比,临床医生在B模式上的准确性更高。

相似文献

1
Interrater Agreement of Physicians Identifying Lung Sliding Artifact on B-Mode And M-Mode Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS).医生在B模式和M模式床旁超声(POCUS)上识别肺滑动伪像的评分者间一致性。
POCUS J. 2025 Apr 15;10(1):92-98. doi: 10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.17807. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Zombie Cruise Ship Virtual Escape Room for POCUS Pulmonary: Scan Your Way Out.用于肺部POCUS的僵尸游轮虚拟密室逃脱:通过扫描逃离。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 15;7(3):SG1-SG23. doi: 10.21980/J8RM0M. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Determinants of point-of-care ultrasound lung sliding amplitude in mechanically ventilated patients.机械通气患者床旁超声肺滑动幅度的决定因素
Ultrasound J. 2023 May 23;15(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00326-5.
4
Advanced emphysema leads to high false positivity rate for pneumothorax in point of care ultrasound.晚期肺气肿导致床旁超声检查气胸时假阳性率较高。
Respir Med. 2024 Dec;235:107860. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107860. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
5
Interrater reliability of pediatric point-of-care lung ultrasound findings.儿童即时肺部超声检查结果的观察者间可靠性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;38(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.047. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
Does the Addition of M-Mode to B-Mode Ultrasound Increase the Accuracy of Identification of Lung Sliding in Traumatic Pneumothoraces?在B模式超声中添加M模式是否能提高创伤性气胸时肺滑动识别的准确性?
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Nov;37(11):2681-2687. doi: 10.1002/jum.14629. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
7
Accuracy and Interrater Reliability of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Image Interpretation for Intussusception.床边超声检查对肠套叠的图像解读的准确性和组内可靠性。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Sep 1;38(9):442-447. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002786. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
Interpretation Accuracy and Interrater Agreement of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Point-of-Care Ultrasound Images among Residents and Faculty.住院医师和教师对小儿皮肤和软组织即时超声图像的解读准确性和组内一致性。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;58(3):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.10.028. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
The interrater reliability of inferior vena cava ultrasound by bedside clinician sonographers in emergency department patients.床旁临床医师超声技师对急诊科患者行下腔静脉超声检查的组内相关系数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jan;18(1):98-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00952.x.
10
Development and Validation of a Point-of-Care-Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment Tool: The POCUS IQ Scale.即时超声影像质量评估工具(POCUS IQ 量表)的研发与验证
J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Jan;42(1):135-145. doi: 10.1002/jum.16095. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic error and bias in the department of radiology: a pictorial essay.放射科的诊断错误与偏差:图文论述
Insights Imaging. 2023 Oct 2;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01521-7.
2
Recommendations for POCUS Curriculum in Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education: Consensus from the Inaugural Seguin Canadian POCUS Education Conference.加拿大本科医学教育中床旁超声课程的建议:首届塞金加拿大床旁超声教育会议的共识
POCUS J. 2023 Apr 26;8(1):13-18. doi: 10.24908/pocus.v8i1.16153. eCollection 2023.
3
Accurate assessment of the lung sliding artefact on lung ultrasonography using a deep learning approach.
使用深度学习方法准确评估肺部超声中的肺滑动伪像。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Sep;148:105953. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105953. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
4
Not so FAST-Chest ultrasound underdiagnoses traumatic pneumothorax.并非如此——胸部超声对创伤性气胸的漏诊率较高。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):44-48. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003429.
5
From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.从“搜索满足”到“后续搜索遗漏”:放射学和认知科学中多目标搜索错误的综述。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Aug 28;6(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00318-w.
6
Diagnosis of Traumatic Pneumothorax: A Comparison between Lung Ultrasound and Supine Chest Radiographs.创伤性气胸的诊断:肺超声与仰卧位胸部X线片的比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;25(2):176-180. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23729.
7
Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department.急诊科创伤患者气胸诊断中胸部超声检查与仰卧位胸部X线摄影的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 23;7(7):CD013031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013031.pub2.
8
The Canadian Medical Student Ultrasound Curriculum: A Statement From the Canadian Ultrasound Consensus for Undergraduate Medical Education Group.《加拿大医学生超声课程:本科医学教育加拿大超声共识小组声明》
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Jul;39(7):1279-1287. doi: 10.1002/jum.15218. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Accuracy of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pneumothorax: A Comparison between Neonates and Adults-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声诊断气胸的准确性:新生儿与成人的比较——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can Respir J. 2019 Dec 3;2019:5271982. doi: 10.1155/2019/5271982. eCollection 2019.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of eFAST in the trauma patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.eFAST 在创伤患者中的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CJEM. 2019 Nov;21(6):727-738. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.381.