利伐沙班与阿哌沙班治疗房颤患者的主要缺血或出血事件的相关性。
Association of Rivaroxaban vs Apixaban With Major Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
机构信息
Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
出版信息
JAMA. 2021 Dec 21;326(23):2395-2404. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21222.
IMPORTANCE
The comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban and apixaban, the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulants for ischemic stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
To compare major ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using computerized enrollment and claims files for US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older. Between January 1, 2013, and November 30, 2018, a total of 581 451 patients with atrial fibrillation began rivaroxaban or apixaban treatment and were followed up for 4 years, through November 30, 2018.
EXPOSURES
Rivaroxaban (n = 227 572) and apixaban (n = 353 879), either standard or reduced dose.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was a composite of major ischemic (stroke/systemic embolism) and hemorrhagic (intracerebral hemorrhage/other intracranial bleeding/fatal extracranial bleeding) events. Secondary outcomes were nonfatal extracranial bleeding and total mortality (fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic event or other death during follow-up). Rates, hazard ratios (HRs), and rate differences (RDs) were adjusted for baseline differences in comorbidity with inverse probability of treatment weighting.
RESULTS
Study patients (mean age, 77.0 years; 291 966 [50.2%] women; 134 393 [23.1%] receiving reduced dose) had 474 605 person-years of follow-up (median [IQR] of 174 [62-397] days). The adjusted primary outcome rate for rivaroxaban was 16.1 per 1000 person-years vs 13.4 per 1000 person-years for apixaban (RD, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.9-3.5]; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.24]). The rivaroxaban group had increased risk for both major ischemic events (8.6 vs 7.6 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.5-1.7]; HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.20]) and hemorrhagic events (7.5 vs 5.9 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.1]; HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.36]), including fatal extracranial bleeding (1.4 vs 1.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.7]; HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.18-1.70]). Patients receiving rivaroxaban had increased risk of nonfatal extracranial bleeding (39.7 vs 18.5 per 1000 person-years; RD, 21.1 [95% CI, 20.0-22.3]; HR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.99-2.15]), fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic events (4.5 vs 3.3 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8-1.6]; HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.21-1.48]), and total mortality (44.2 vs 41.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.8-4.5]; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09]). The risk of the primary outcome was increased for rivaroxaban in both those receiving the reduced dose (27.4 vs 21.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 6.4 [95% CI, 4.1-8.7]; HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.16-1.40]) and the standard dose (13.2 vs 11.4 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.0-2.6]; HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]) groups.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation, treatment with rivaroxaban compared with apixaban was associated with a significantly increased risk of major ischemic or hemorrhagic events.
重要性
在因缺血性中风而接受预防治疗的伴有心房颤动的患者中,利伐沙班和阿哌沙班是最常被开的两种口服抗凝药,它们的疗效比较尚不确定。
目的
比较心房颤动患者接受利伐沙班或阿哌沙班治疗后的主要缺血性和出血性结局。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,利用美国医疗保险受益人的计算机登记和索赔档案。2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 11 月 30 日,共有 581451 例患有心房颤动的患者开始接受利伐沙班或阿哌沙班治疗,并随访 4 年,截至 2018 年 11 月 30 日。
暴露因素
接受利伐沙班(n=227572)或阿哌沙班(n=353879)治疗的患者,剂量有标准剂量和降低剂量。
主要结局和测量指标
主要结局是由主要缺血性(中风/全身性栓塞)和出血性(颅内出血/其他颅内出血/致命性外出血)事件组成的复合结局。次要结局是非致命性外出血和总死亡率(随访期间致命性缺血/出血事件或其他死亡)。采用逆概率治疗加权法对基线合并症差异进行调整后,计算了发生率、风险比(HR)和率差(RD)。
结果
研究患者(平均年龄,77.0 岁;291966 [50.2%] 为女性;134393 [23.1%] 接受降低剂量)的中位随访时间(IQR)为 174(62-397)天,共随访 474605 人年。利伐沙班组的主要结局发生率为 16.1/1000 人年,阿哌沙班组为 13.4/1000 人年(RD,2.7[95%CI,1.9-3.5];HR,1.18[95%CI,1.12-1.24])。利伐沙班组主要缺血性事件的风险更高(8.6/1000 人年vs 7.6/1000 人年;RD,1.1[95%CI,0.5-1.7];HR,1.12[95%CI,1.04-1.20])和出血性事件(7.5/1000 人年 vs 5.9/1000 人年;RD,1.6[95%CI,1.1-2.1];HR,1.26[95%CI,1.16-1.36]),包括致命性外出血(1.4/1000 人年 vs 1.0/1000 人年;RD,0.4[95%CI,0.2-0.7];HR,1.41[95%CI,1.18-1.70])。接受利伐沙班治疗的患者非致命性外出血的风险更高(39.7/1000 人年 vs 18.5/1000 人年;RD,21.1[95%CI,20.0-22.3];HR,2.07[95%CI,1.99-2.15])、致命性缺血/出血性事件(4.5/1000 人年 vs 3.3/1000 人年;RD,1.2[95%CI,0.8-1.6];HR,1.34[95%CI,1.21-1.48])和总死亡率(44.2/1000 人年 vs 41.0/1000 人年;RD,3.1[95%CI,1.8-4.5];HR,1.06[95%CI,1.02-1.09])。在接受降低剂量(27.4/1000 人年 vs 21.0/1000 人年;RD,6.4[95%CI,4.1-8.7];HR,1.28[95%CI,1.16-1.40])和标准剂量(13.2/1000 人年 vs 11.4/1000 人年;RD,1.8[95%CI,1.0-2.6];HR,1.13[95%CI,1.06-1.21])治疗的患者中,利伐沙班组发生主要结局的风险均增加。
结论和相关性
在年龄 65 岁及以上的伴有心房颤动的医疗保险受益人中,与阿哌沙班相比,利伐沙班治疗与主要缺血性或出血性事件风险显著增加相关。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-8-1
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025-7-22
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025-8-12
本文引用的文献
Int J Mol Sci. 2021-8-8
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020-4
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019-10-29