Reliability of a self-administrated musculoskeletal questionnaire: The fourth Trøndelag health study.

BACKGROUND

The reliability of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) has not been evaluated in an unselected general population. The aim of this population-based follow-up study was to estimate the reliability between a self-administered NMQ-based questionnaire and a face-to-face interview performed approximately two months later. To interpret the results, we assessed the 1-year prevalence of various pain musculoskeletal pain locations.

METHODS

A random sample of 1201 participants in the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Survey were invited to a follow-up interview focusing on sleep and pain. A total of 232 (19%) participated a semi-structured interview, and the agreement with the corresponding answers in the musculoskeletal questionnaire in HUNT4 were evaluated by Cohen's kappa statistics with 95% confidence interval (CI). The 1-year prevalence of the various pain sites was stratified by age and gender.

RESULTS

The reliability was good for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP), chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain (CWMSP) and pain in hip and knee (kappa values between 0.63 and 0.68). Moderate kappa values between 0.51 and 0.60 were found for pain in the neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, upper back, lower back, calf, ankle/feet, and ≥7 pain sites. The 1-year prevalence was 54.3% for CMSP and 17.2 for CWMSP, substantially higher for women and among those aged 50 years or more.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study the reliability between interview and questionnaire was good to moderate for most pain locations. In particular, the self-administered musculoskeletal questionnaire seems to be a useful tool in identifying individuals with CMSP, CWMSP, and pain in hip and knee.