Bürger Wolfgang, Nübling Rüdiger, Streibelt Marco
fbg forschung und beratung im gesundheitswesen, Karlsruhe.
GfQG - Gesellschaft für Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, Karlsruhe.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2022 Jun;61(3):177-185. doi: 10.1055/a-1668-7797. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
The user perception of the work-related treatment is of great importance for the further development and success of work-related medical rehabilitation (WMR). The German Pension Insurance Fund (Deutsche Rentenversicherung DRV Bund) has therefore supported the development of the questionnaire WMR-R that can be used to assess the quality of the structure, process and results of work-related rehabilitation treatment from the patient's point of view. This paper presents a short version and compares it with the long version.
Based on a representative sample stratified by indication, employed rehabilitants up to the age of 65 were randomly selected to be questioned 6 months after their rehabilitation with a long version (N=28276) or a short version (N=6611) of WMR-R. In addition, routine data of the German Pension Insurance Fund were included. 27 items each of the long version and 8 items of the short version are added up to a total score and compared with regard to test statistical quality criteria and sample sensitivity.
Participation rates were slightly higher in the short version (31%, N=2115) than in the long version (28%, N=8019). The processing quality in both versions is comparable. The short and long versions correlate with each other at r=0.96 (p<0.01). Both versions have similar validity characteristics and separate well between WMR and standard rehabilitation. Both versions are robust to demographic, disease-related and socio-medical risk factors. Rehabilitants with addiction and psychosomatic as well as neurological diseases rate their rehabilitation as significantly more work-oriented compared to other indications, especially pneumology.
Due to the low survey effort and the simple evaluation and interpretation, the short version is particularly suitable for routine surveys of WMR care quality. The long version allows a differentiated recording of the WMR offer of rehabilitation facilities in the sense of strength/weakness analyses.
用户对工伤治疗的看法对于工伤医疗康复(WMR)的进一步发展和成功至关重要。因此,德国养老保险基金(Deutsche Rentenversicherung DRV Bund)支持开发了问卷WMR-R,该问卷可用于从患者角度评估工伤康复治疗的结构、过程和结果的质量。本文介绍了一个简短版本,并将其与长版本进行比较。
基于按适应症分层的代表性样本,随机选择65岁及以下的在职康复者,在其康复6个月后用WMR-R的长版本(N = 28276)或短版本(N = 6611)进行询问。此外,还纳入了德国养老保险基金的常规数据。长版本的27项和短版本的8项相加得出总分,并就测试统计质量标准和样本敏感性进行比较。
短版本的参与率(31%,N = 2115)略高于长版本(28%,N = 8019)。两个版本的处理质量相当。短版本和长版本的相关性为r = 0.96(p < 0.01)。两个版本具有相似的效度特征,并且在WMR和标准康复之间有明显区分。两个版本对人口统计学、疾病相关和社会医疗风险因素都具有稳健性。与其他适应症(尤其是肺病)相比,患有成瘾、身心疾病以及神经疾病的康复者对其康复的评价明显更以工作为导向。
由于调查工作量小且评估和解释简单,短版本特别适合对WMR护理质量进行常规调查。长版本允许从优势/劣势分析的角度对康复机构提供的WMR进行差异化记录。