• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《平价医疗法案》扩大医疗补助计划后糖尿病处方模式的变化。

Changes in diabetes prescription patterns following Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University - Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Dec;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002135.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002135
PMID:34933870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8679078/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with diabetes mellitus are prescribed medications to control their blood glucose. The implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) led to improved access to healthcare for patients with diabetes. However, impact of the ACA on prescribing trends by diabetes drug category is less clear. This study aims to assess if long-acting insulin and novel agents were prescribed more frequently following the ACA in states that expanded Medicaid compared with non-expansion states.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this analysis of a natural experiment, prescriptions reimbursed by Medicaid (US public insurance) for long-acting insulins, metformin, and novel agent medications (DPP4 inhibitors, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor antagonists, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) from 2012 to 2017 were obtained from public records. For each medication category, we performed difference-in-differences (DID) analysis modeling change in rate level from pre-ACA to post-ACA in Medicaid expansion states relative to Medicaid non-expansion states.

RESULTS

Expansion and non-expansion states saw a decline in both metformin and long-acting insulin prescriptions per 100 enrollees from pre-ACA to post-ACA. These decreases were larger in non-expansion states relative to expansion states (metformin: absolute DID = +0.33, 95% CI=0.323 to 0.344) and long-acting insulin (absolute DID: +0.11; 95% CI=0.098 to 0.113). Novel agent prescriptions in expansion states (+0.08 per 100 enrollees) saw a higher absolute increase per 100 Medicaid enrollees than in non-expansion states (absolute DID= +0.08, 95% CI=0.079 to 0.086).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a greater absolute increase for prescriptions of novel agents in expansion states relative to non-expansion states after accounting for number of enrollees. Reducing administrative barriers and improving the ability of providers to prescribe such newer therapies will be critical for caring for patients with diabetes-particularly in Medicaid non-expansion states.

摘要

简介

大多数糖尿病患者都需要服用药物来控制血糖。《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的实施改善了糖尿病患者获得医疗保健的机会。然而,ACA 对按糖尿病药物类别开处方的趋势的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估在扩大医疗补助的州与未扩大医疗补助的州相比,长效胰岛素和新型药物(二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂拮抗剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂)在 ACA 之后是否更频繁地被开处方。

研究设计和方法

在这项自然实验的分析中,从公共记录中获取了 2012 年至 2017 年 Medicaid(美国公共保险)报销的长效胰岛素、二甲双胍和新型药物(二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂拮抗剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂)的处方。对于每种药物类别,我们使用差异中的差异(DID)分析模型来衡量 Medicaid 扩大州和非扩大州从 ACA 前到 ACA 后每 100 名参保人用药率的变化。

结果

在 ACA 前到 ACA 后,扩大和非扩大州的每 100 名参保人开具的二甲双胍和长效胰岛素处方都有所减少。非扩大州的降幅大于扩大州(二甲双胍:绝对 DID=+0.33,95%CI=0.323 至 0.344)和长效胰岛素(绝对 DID:+0.11;95%CI=0.098 至 0.113)。在扩大州,新型药物的处方增加了 0.08 每 100 名参保人,比非扩大州增加了 0.08 每 100 名参保人(绝对 DID=+0.08,95%CI=0.079 至 0.086)。

结论

在考虑参保人数后,扩大州新型药物处方的绝对增幅高于非扩大州。减少行政障碍并提高提供者开此类新型疗法的能力,对于糖尿病患者的治疗至关重要,尤其是在非扩大医疗补助的州。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/8679078/6633bb2bae1d/bmjdrc-2021-002135f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/8679078/6633bb2bae1d/bmjdrc-2021-002135f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/8679078/6633bb2bae1d/bmjdrc-2021-002135f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in diabetes prescription patterns following Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.《平价医疗法案》扩大医疗补助计划后糖尿病处方模式的变化。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Dec;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002135.
2
New hypertension and diabetes diagnoses following the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.平价医疗法案扩大医疗补助计划后新诊断的高血压和糖尿病。
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Dec;8(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000607.
3
Prescription Drug Utilization and Reimbursement Increased Following State Medicaid Expansion in 2014.2014 年,州医疗补助计划扩大后,处方药的利用和报销都有所增加。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):355-363. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.355.
4
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion on Acute Diabetes Complications Among Community Health Center Patients.平价医疗法案医疗补助扩张对社区卫生中心患者急性糖尿病并发症的影响。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231171437. doi: 10.1177/21501319231171437.
5
Has the Affordable Care Act Been Associated with Increased Insurance Coverage and Early-stage Diagnoses of Bone and Soft-tissue Sarcomas in Adults?平价医疗法案是否与成年人的保险覆盖范围增加和骨与软组织肉瘤的早期诊断有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):493-502. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001438.
6
Is the affordable care act medicaid expansion associated with receipt of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy by race and ethnicity?平价医疗法案(ACA)的医疗补助扩大计划是否与按种族和民族划分的心力衰竭指南导向的医疗治疗的获得有关?
Am Heart J. 2022 Feb;244:135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
7
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on Visit Rates for Diabetes in Safety Net Health Centers.平价医疗法案(ACA)医疗补助扩大对安全网医疗中心糖尿病就诊率的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):905-916. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180075.
8
Black clients in expansion states who used opioids were more likely to access medication for opioid use disorder after ACA implementation.在《平价医疗法案》实施后,使用阿片类药物的扩张州的黑人患者更有可能获得阿片类药物使用障碍的药物治疗。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Feb;133:108533. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108533. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
Medicaid Expansion and Utilization of Antihyperglycemic Therapies.医疗补助计划的扩大与降糖疗法的使用
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2684-2690. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0735. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
Changes in Utilization and Health Among Low-Income Adults After Medicaid Expansion or Expanded Private Insurance.医疗补助扩大或扩大私人保险后,低收入成年人的利用和健康状况的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4419.

引用本文的文献

1
Multimodal Identification of Molecular Factors Linked to Severe Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Artificial Intelligence.基于人工智能的严重糖尿病足溃疡相关分子因素的多模态识别。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 4;25(19):10686. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910686.
2
Factors Associated With Blood Pressure Control Among Patients in Community Health Centers.社区卫生中心患者血压控制的相关因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 May;64(5):631-641. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.11.002. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
The Association Between Medicaid Expansion and Diabetic Ketoacidosis Hospitalizations.

本文引用的文献

1
New hypertension and diabetes diagnoses following the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.平价医疗法案扩大医疗补助计划后新诊断的高血压和糖尿病。
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Dec;8(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000607.
2
Trends in Insulin Out-of-Pocket Costs and Reimbursement Price Among US Patients With Private Health Insurance, 2006-2017.2006-2017 年美国私人医疗保险患者胰岛素自付费用和报销价格趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):1010-1012. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1302.
3
Disparities in Biomarkers for Patients With Diabetes After the Affordable Care Act.
医疗补助扩大与糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院治疗之间的关联
Cureus. 2022 Oct 24;14(10):e30631. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30631. eCollection 2022 Oct.
《平价医疗法案》实施后糖尿病患者生物标志物的差异
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S31-S39. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001257.
4
Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Serious Renal Events: Scandinavian Cohort Study.胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂的使用与严重肾脏事件风险:斯堪的纳维亚队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jun;43(6):1326-1335. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2088. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - .美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会关于2型糖尿病综合管理算法的共识声明 -
Endocr Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):107-139. doi: 10.4158/CS-2019-0472.
6
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S006.
7
Health Care Expenditures Among Adults With Diabetes After Oregon's Medicaid Expansion.俄勒冈州扩大医疗补助计划后,糖尿病成年人的医疗保健支出。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Mar;43(3):572-579. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1343. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Association of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion with Dilated Eye Examinations among the United States Population with Diabetes.平价医疗法案(Affordable Care Act)中医疗补助扩张计划与美国糖尿病患者散瞳检查的关联。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jul;127(7):920-928. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9
The Affordable Care Act and Health Insurance Coverage Among People With Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Diabetes: Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.《平价医疗法案》与已诊断和未诊断糖尿病患者的医疗保险覆盖情况:来自国家健康与营养检查调查的数据
Diabetes Care. 2019 Nov;42(11):e179-e180. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0081. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
10
Lack of Treatment Persistence and Treatment Nonadherence as Barriers to Glycaemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.治疗依从性差和不坚持治疗是2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的障碍
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Apr;10(2):437-449. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0590-x. Epub 2019 Mar 8.