Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Scheim), Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pa.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Scheim), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Sciences (Coleman), Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ont.; School of Public Health & Social Policy (Lachowsky), Faculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Bauer), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):E1213-E1222. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210061. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.
Previous Canadian studies have identified problems regarding health care access for transgender (trans) and nonbinary people, but all-ages national data have been lacking. This study describes access to care among trans and nonbinary people in Canada, and compares health care access across provinces or regions.
We conducted a bilingual, multimode cross-sectional survey (Trans PULSE Canada) from July 26 to Oct. 1, 2019. We recruited trans and nonbinary people aged 14 years and older using convenience sampling. We assessed 5 outcomes: having a primary care provider, having a primary care provider with whom the respondent was comfortable discussing trans health issues, past-year unmet health care need, medical gender affirmation status, and being on a wait-list to access gender-affirming medical care. Average marginal predictions were estimated from multivariable logistic regression models with multiply imputed data.
The survey included 2873 participants, and 2217 surveys were analyzed after exclusions. Of the 2217 trans and nonbinary respondents, most had a primary care provider ( = 1803; 81.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 79.8%-83.0%), with model-predicted probabilities from 52.1% (95% CI 20.2%-84.1%) in the territories to 92.9% (95% CI 83.5%-100.0%) in Newfoundland and Labrador. Of the respondents, 52.3% ( = 1150; 95% CI 50.3%-54.2%) had a primary care provider with whom they were comfortable discussing trans health issues, and 44.4% ( = 978; 95% CI 42.3%-46.4%) reported an unmet health care need. Among participants who needed gender-affirming medical treatment ( = 1627), self-defined treatment completion ranged from an estimated 16.8% (95% CI 0.6%-32.5%) in Newfoundland and Labrador to 59.1% (95% CI 52.5%-65.6%) in Quebec. Of those who needed but had not completed gender-affirming care at the time of the study ( = 1046), 40.7% ( = 416; 95% CI 37.8%-43.6%) were on a wait-list, most often for surgery. These outcomes, with the exception of having a provider with whom one is comfortable discussing trans issues, varied significantly by province or region ( < 0.05).
Participants reported considerable unmet needs or delays in primary, general and gender-affirming care, with significant regional variation. Our results indicate that, despite efforts toward equity in access to care for trans and nonbinary people in Canada, inequities persist.
先前的加拿大研究已经发现跨性别者(跨性别)和非二元性别者在获得医疗保健方面存在问题,但缺乏全年龄段的全国性数据。本研究描述了加拿大跨性别者和非二元性别者获得医疗保健的情况,并比较了各省或地区之间的医疗保健获取情况。
我们于 2019 年 7 月 26 日至 10 月 1 日进行了一项双语、多模式的横断面调查(Trans PULSE 加拿大)。我们使用便利抽样招募了 14 岁及以上的跨性别者和非二元性别者。我们评估了 5 项结果:有初级保健提供者、有愿意讨论跨性别健康问题的初级保健提供者、过去一年未满足的医疗保健需求、医疗性别确认状况和等待获得性别肯定的医疗护理。使用多重插补数据的多变量逻辑回归模型估计平均边缘预测值。
该调查共包括 2873 名参与者,排除后分析了 2217 份调查。在 2217 名跨性别和非二元性别受访者中,大多数人有初级保健提供者(=1803;81.4%,95%置信区间[CI]79.8%-83.0%),预测概率从 52.1%(95% CI 20.2%-84.1%)在领土到 92.9%(95% CI 83.5%-100.0%)在纽芬兰和拉布拉多。在受访者中,52.3%(=1150;95% CI 50.3%-54.2%)有一位愿意讨论跨性别健康问题的初级保健提供者,44.4%(=978;95% CI 42.3%-46.4%)报告存在未满足的医疗保健需求。在需要性别肯定治疗的参与者中(=1627),自我定义的治疗完成率从纽芬兰和拉布拉多的估计 16.8%(95% CI 0.6%-32.5%)到魁北克的 59.1%(95% CI 52.5%-65.6%)不等。在研究时需要但尚未完成性别肯定护理的参与者中(=1046),40.7%(=416;95% CI 37.8%-43.6%)在等待名单上,大多数是在等待手术。除了有一位愿意讨论跨性别问题的提供者外,这些结果在各省或地区之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。
参与者报告了大量未满足的需求或初级、一般和性别肯定护理的延迟,存在显著的区域差异。我们的研究结果表明,尽管加拿大在努力实现跨性别和非二元性别者获得医疗保健方面的公平,但仍然存在不平等现象。