Chen Chao, Guo Sheng-Nan, Hao Yang, Ai Yan-Ke, Jiang Li-Jie
Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021 Dec 12;41(12):1387-93. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20201207-k0002.
There are some common problems in the systematic review and meta-analysis on acupuncture-moxibustion, e.g. indistinct definition and errors in methodology. In order to further improve the quality of relevant literature, in association with the characteristics of acupuncture-moxibustion, based on the framework of PICOS (P: population, I: interventions, C: comparisons, O: outcomes, S: study designs), the paper explores how to construct specific research questions. In methodology, the paper analyzes the common problems from five aspects, including literature retrieval, bias assessment, analysis and interpretation of results, selection of other types of meta-analysis and the update of methodology. Based on the analysis above, the paper discusses the corresponding countermeasures.
针灸系统评价与Meta分析存在一些常见问题,如定义不明确、方法学错误等。为进一步提高相关文献质量,结合针灸特点,基于PICOS(P:人群,I:干预措施,C:对照,O:结局,S:研究设计)框架,探讨如何构建具体的研究问题。在方法学方面,从文献检索、偏倚评估、结果分析与解释、其他类型Meta分析的选择以及方法学更新五个方面分析常见问题。基于上述分析,探讨相应对策。