Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Center for Bioethics, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill. North Carolina, USA.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Jun;20(3):283-290. doi: 10.1089/bio.2021.0088. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
The proliferation of biobanking activities demand a review of current training opportunities for service providers and researchers, specifically related to the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) of biobanking research. Such information could be useful for planning and developing an educational course. However, it is equally important to explore the platform for offering such a course. This study explored stakeholder perspectives on training needs in biobanking research and the use of an online training platform for such educational purposes. An exploratory study design using qualitative data was used. The study sample comprised selected stakeholders ( = 25) including biobankers, clinicians, researchers, postgraduate students, and research ethics committee members. Semi-structured in-person or Skype interviews were conducted and all ethical considerations were upheld. The interview focused on participants' perspectives on the accessibility and applicability of current available courses, and advantages and disadvantages of online biobanking courses. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The following themes arose from data analysis: inadequate availability of online courses, and advantages and disadvantages of online courses and opportunities for a successful training course. There was general consensus regarding the limited availability of context-specific training opportunities on the ELSI of biobanking. The majority of participants were previously self-taught and therefore relied on existing literature and collaborations with international biobanking groups for ongoing learning. Some respondents indicated that the costs of such available training courses were exorbitant. Some respondents also felt that available courses were not tailored to the specific needs of a diverse audience in biobanking. Apart from access, respondents reported possible challenges with internet connectivity and availability of data. Respondents expressed a need for affordable and focused online educational opportunities in biobanking, but highlighted that these courses need to be contextualized and integrated into other learning activities.
生物银行活动的激增要求对服务提供商和研究人员的当前培训机会进行审查,特别是与生物库研究的伦理、法律和社会问题(ELSI)相关的培训机会。这些信息对于规划和开发教育课程可能是有用的。但是,探索提供此类课程的平台同样重要。本研究探讨了利益相关者对生物库研究培训需求的看法,以及在线培训平台在这种教育目的中的使用。本研究采用定性数据的探索性研究设计。研究样本包括选定的利益相关者( = 25),包括生物银行家、临床医生、研究人员、研究生和研究伦理委员会成员。进行了半结构化的面对面或 Skype 访谈,并遵守了所有伦理考虑因素。访谈重点是参与者对现有课程的可访问性和适用性的看法,以及在线生物库课程的优缺点。使用主题分析对数据进行分析。数据分析产生了以下主题:在线课程的可用性不足,在线课程的优缺点以及成功培训课程的机会。关于生物库 ELSI 的特定于上下文的培训机会有限,大多数参与者对此达成了共识。大多数参与者以前都是自学的,因此依赖于现有的文献和与国际生物库团体的合作,以进行持续学习。一些受访者表示,这些可用培训课程的费用过高。一些受访者还认为,可用课程没有针对生物库中不同受众的具体需求进行定制。除了访问之外,受访者还报告了可能存在的互联网连接和数据可用性方面的挑战。受访者表示需要负担得起且重点突出的生物库在线教育机会,但强调这些课程需要上下文化并整合到其他学习活动中。