Laurent Alexis, Abdel-Sayed Philippe, Scaletta Corinne, Laurent Philippe, Laurent Elénie, Michetti Murielle, de Buys Roessingh Anthony, Raffoul Wassim, Hirt-Burri Nathalie, Applegate Lee Ann
Regenerative Therapy Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Dec 17;8(12):221. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8120221.
Empirically studied by Dr. Brown-Séquard in the late 1800s, cytotherapies were later democratized by Dr. Niehans during the twentieth century in Western Switzerland. Many local cultural landmarks around the Léman Riviera are reminiscent of the inception of such cell-based treatments. Despite the discreet extravagance of the remaining heirs of "living cell therapy" and specific enforcements by Swiss health authorities, current interest in modern and scientifically sound cell-based regenerative medicine has never been stronger. Respective progress made in bioengineering and in biotechnology have enabled the clinical implementation of modern cell-based therapeutic treatments within updated medical and regulatory frameworks. Notably, the Swiss progenitor cell transplantation program has enabled the gathering of two decades of clinical experience in Lausanne for the therapeutic management of cutaneous and musculoskeletal affections, using homologous allogeneic cell-based approaches. While striking conceptual similarities exist between the respective works of the fathers of cytotherapy and of modern highly specialized clinicians, major and important iterative updates have been implemented, centered on product quality and risk-analysis-based patient safety insurance. This perspective article highlights some historical similarities and major evolutive differences, particularly regarding product safety and quality issues, characterizing the use of cell-based therapies in Switzerland over the past century. We outline the vast therapeutic potential to be harnessed for the benefit of overall patient health and the importance of specific scientific methodological aspects.
19世纪后期,布朗-塞卡尔博士对细胞疗法进行了实证研究,20世纪,尼汉斯博士在瑞士西部将细胞疗法推广开来。莱芒湖畔的许多当地文化地标都让人想起这种基于细胞的治疗方法的起源。尽管“活细胞疗法”的现存继承者行事低调奢华,且瑞士卫生当局有特定规定,但当前对现代且科学合理的基于细胞的再生医学的兴趣从未如此强烈。生物工程和生物技术方面取得的相应进展,使得在更新后的医学和监管框架内能够临床应用现代基于细胞的治疗方法。值得注意的是,瑞士祖细胞移植项目在洛桑积累了二十年的临床经验,采用基于同源同种异体细胞的方法治疗皮肤和肌肉骨骼疾病。虽然细胞疗法之父与现代高度专业化临床医生的各自工作之间存在显著的概念相似性,但已经进行了重大且重要的迭代更新,重点是产品质量和基于风险分析的患者安全保障。这篇观点文章强调了一些历史相似性和主要的演变差异,特别是在产品安全和质量问题方面,这些问题体现了过去一个世纪瑞士基于细胞疗法的使用情况。我们概述了为患者整体健康而利用的巨大治疗潜力以及特定科学方法方面的重要性。