Suppr超能文献

增材制造和铣削牙科氧化锆的机械性能和结合强度:初步研究。

Mechanical Properties and Bond Strength of Additively Manufactured and Milled Dental Zirconia: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Gülhane Dentistry, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;31(7):629-634. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13472. Epub 2022 Jan 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the mechanical properties and ceramic bond of additively manufactured and milled dental zirconia materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Disc (r = 10 mm, h = 2 mm) and bar (25 4 × 1. 2 mm) shaped milled (M group) (Nacera Pearl; Doceram) and additively manufactured (AM group) (NanoParticle Jetting; XJet, Carmel 1400) zirconia specimens were prepared for 2 experimental groups. Ceramic was applied to the disc specimens (h = 4 mm, r = 6 mm) (n = 9) and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The surface morphology of disc specimens was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The Vickers microhardness (Vh), surface roughness (Ra), and three-point flexural strength (FS) of bar specimens (n = 9) were measured. Results were statistically analyzed with Mann-Whitney U-test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in FS and Vh values of the M and AM groups. M group (1501.4 ± 60.1 HV1) showed a significantly higher Vh value than the AM group (1169.2 ± 48.4 HV1) (p < 0.001). FS of the M group (1287.5 ± 115.2 MPa) exhibited significantly high value than the AM (1030.0 ± 29.2 Mpa) group (p < 0.001). Statistically, no significant differences were seen in SBS and Ra values of the M and AM groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the manufacturing technique affected the mechanical properties of the zirconia materials. AM zirconia material showed lower Vh and FS values than M zirconia. Additionally AM zirconia demonstrated adequate bond strength with dental ceramic.

摘要

目的

评估和比较增材制造和铣削牙科氧化锆材料的机械性能和陶瓷结合强度。

材料和方法

制备了盘状(r = 10 mm,h = 2 mm)和棒状(25 4 × 1. 2 mm)形状的铣削(M 组)(Nacera Pearl;Doceram)和增材制造(AM 组)(NanoParticle Jetting;XJet,Carmel 1400)氧化锆试件用于 2 个实验组。将陶瓷施加到盘状试件(h = 4 mm,r = 6 mm)(n = 9)上,并测量其剪切结合强度(SBS)。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析了盘状试件的表面形态。测量了棒状试件(n = 9)的维氏显微硬度(Vh)、表面粗糙度(Ra)和三点弯曲强度(FS)。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验(α = 0.05)对结果进行了统计分析。

结果

M 组和 AM 组的 FS 和 Vh 值存在显著差异。M 组(1501.4 ± 60.1 HV1)的 Vh 值明显高于 AM 组(1169.2 ± 48.4 HV1)(p < 0.001)。M 组的 FS(1287.5 ± 115.2 MPa)值明显高于 AM 组(1030.0 ± 29.2 MPa)(p < 0.001)。统计学上,M 组和 AM 组的 SBS 和 Ra 值无显著差异。

结论

在本体外研究的限制内,制造技术影响了氧化锆材料的机械性能。AM 氧化锆材料的 Vh 和 FS 值低于 M 氧化锆。此外,AM 氧化锆与牙科陶瓷表现出足够的结合强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验