Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28318. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028318.
Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are useful for monitoring tje renal status of benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis (BHN). This study aimed to compare the applicability of 6 equations (Cockcroft-Gault [CG] adjusted for body surface area, original modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD], American abbreviated MDRD, Chinese modified MDRD, Chinese abbreviated MDRD, and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology [CKD-EPI]) to estimate GFR in a Chinese BHN population. A total of 179 patients diagnosed with BHN were enrolled. The GFR estimated by each equation was compared to the reference GFR (rGFR) measured using the dual plasma sampling technetium-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid method. The Chinese modified and Chinese abbreviated MDRD equations overestimated the rGFR, while the CG, CG adjusted for body surface area, original MDRD, American abbreviated MDRD, and CKD-EPI equations underestimated the rGFR. The difference in performance between estimated GFR (eGFR) based on the American abbreviated MDRD equation and the rGFR was not statistically significant (P = .191), while differences in the others were statistically significant (P < .05). Furthermore, the advantages in deviation, absolute deviation, deviation degree, precision, and accuracy were also significantly different from those of the other equations. Our findings suggest that eGFR based on the American abbreviated MDRD equation is suitable for the Chinese BHN population.
方程来估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)可用于监测良性高血压性肾硬化症(BHN)的肾脏状况。本研究旨在比较 6 种方程(基于体表面积校正的 Cockcroft-Gault [CG]、改良肾脏病饮食研究 [MDRD]、美国简化 MDRD、中国改良 MDRD、中国简化 MDRD 和慢性肾脏病流行病学合作研究 [CKD-EPI])在估计中国 BHN 人群中的肾小球滤过率的适用性。共纳入 179 例诊断为 BHN 的患者。用每种方程估计的肾小球滤过率与用双血浆样本锝-99m 标记的二乙三胺五乙酸法测量的参考肾小球滤过率(rGFR)进行比较。中国改良和中国简化 MDRD 方程高估了 rGFR,而 CG、基于体表面积校正的 CG、原始 MDRD、美国简化 MDRD 和 CKD-EPI 方程低估了 rGFR。基于美国简化 MDRD 方程的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)与 rGFR 之间的性能差异无统计学意义(P=0.191),而其他方程之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,偏差、绝对偏差、偏差度、精度和准确性方面的优势也与其他方程明显不同。我们的研究结果表明,基于美国简化 MDRD 方程的 eGFR 适用于中国 BHN 人群。